Case Details

Citation(s)
1985 SLG 832 1985 SLD 832 (1985) 51 TAX 26 1985 PTD 401 1985 PTCL 467
Sindh High Court
Income-tax References No. 187, of 1974, decision dated: 19-09-1984
AJMAL MIAN AND SYED HAIDER ALI, PIRZADA, JJ
Waheed Farooqi, Advocate, for the Appellant. Ali Athar, Advocate, for the
Respondent

COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax (INVESTIGATION), LAHORE

VS

SOLI M. COWASJEE, KARACHI

Law: Income Tax Act, 1922

Section: 66(1),16(1)(b),48,proviso(ii),55,48(1),2 3,24,23(5)(a)

Income-tax Act, 1922 -- Sections 16(1)(b), 24, 48, 55, Proviso (ii) of Part I of the Third Schedule -- Super tax -- Exemption -- Refund due on determining the total income -- Assessees partners in various firms, some of which paid super tax -- Super-tax apportioned amongst the partners in the profit sharing capacity -- Assessees suffered loss were not liable to any tax -- Super-tax attributable to the partners in profit sharing capacity and not under Sec. 16(1)(b) -- Whether justified -- Held yes -- Super-tax paid by the firm -- Whether refund could be claimed in the hands of partners who had suffered loss -- Held no -- Super-tax paid by firm -- Claim of refund by partner suffering overall loss -- Assessees partners in various firms -- Some of firms paid super-tax which was apportioned between partners as per their respective shares after payments by firms concerned -- Such partners who had suffered overall losses and were not liable to pay income-tax claimed refund of their respective shares paid by firms and debited to them on strength of proviso (ii) of Part I of Third Schedule to Act -- Held: Assessee could claim set-off or carry forward loss of one assessment year to subsequent year under section 24 of Act but no claim for refund of super-tax could be entertained under said proviso on ground that assessee partner had suffered overall loss in a particular year -- Section 48 was not applicable in circumstances -- Firm was charged with proper super-tax on computation of its income -- Liability to pay super-tax was of firm though amount of super-tax paid by firm was apportioned among partners -- Section 16(1)(b) of Act also had no relevancy for purpose of computing partners' share of super-tax which was to be allocated to partners in their respective profit sharing capacity -- Super-tax -- Refund of -- Partner can claim refund of tax amount which included income-tax and super-tax in excess of 75% or in excess of any other specified maximum percentage in Finance Act of relevant assessment year of the income for bringing down his total liability maximum of 75% but he cannot claim refund of super-tax on ground that his overall income is low or he has suffered…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492