| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1985 SLG 611 1985 SLD 611 1985 SCMR 885 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 278 of 1982, decision dated: 19-03-1984(On appeal from the judgment dated 23-1-1982 of the Lahore High Court in Writ Petition No.8936-S/1980)
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN AND NASIM HASAN SHAH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 278 of 1982, decision dated: 19-03-1984(On appeal from the judgment dated 23-1-1982 of the Lahore High Court in Writ Petition No.8936-S/1980)
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN AND NASIM HASAN SHAH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HEADQUARTER, and others
VS
MUHAMMAD LATIF
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-Arts. 212 (3)--Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Art. 9-Writ jurisdiction of High Court--Leave to appeal granted to consider substantial question of public importance in relation to powers of High Court to set aside order of Service Tribunal in exercise of writ jurisdiction and involving interpretation of Art. 212 of Constitution (1973). ORDER NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.--The learned counsel for the petitioners drew our attention to Paras. 11 & 12 of the judgment of the learned Single Judge in the High Court which read as follows:- "11. The learned counsel for the respondents (petitioners herein) then came forth with another submission resting on Article 212 of the Constitution to urge that the Service Tribunal's order is appealable before the Supreme Court and as another adequate remedy is available to the petitioner (respondent herein), the writ petition is not maintainable. 12. This argument does not deserve any serious consideration, for under Article 212 en appeal lies to the Supreme Court only if the case involves a substantial question of law of public importance. However, the instant case does not present any such question of law of public importance but nevertheless it being an order based on no evidence and also violative of the mandatory provision of the police rules, is liable to be struck down in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court." It is submitted that the view of the learned Judge that the writ jurisdiction of the High Court would be available in the circumstances alluded by him above is untenable. Article 212 of the Constitution creates Service Tribunals conferring upon them exclusive jurisdiction in respect of theβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492