Law: Supreme Court Rules, 1956

Section: O.XXVI

Supreme Court Rules, 1956---O. XXVI--Review by Supreme Court--Review Petition based on what was said to be a factual inaccuracy in recital of date of an order and authority which passed same--Legal questions which were sought to be examined were same which were already examined at length--Factual mistake pointed out, having no bearing on legal questions sought to be examined--Petitioner, however, raising another point which was not raised at any earlier stage not even in petition seeking leave from Supreme Court--Review petition,-held, in fact was claiming a rehearing of same points without proper grounds or reasons--Petition dismissed. ORDER SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--The petitioner, a tenant, seeks review of our order, dated 4-2-1980, whereby his petition for leave to appeal against an ejectment order originating in the Court of the Rent Controller and maintained by the High Court was dismissed. 2. The review petition is based on what is said to be a factual inaccuracy in recital of date of an order and the authority which passed it on the settlement side. The legal questions which are sought to be examined are the same namely, the effect of remand earlier ordered by the High Court in Constitutional petition and its being set aside by the Supreme Court and the scope and meaning of the expression "possession" used in section 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation)…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492