| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1985 SLG 2373 1985 SLD 2373 1985 PLC 204 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. MN-47 of 1984, decided on 24th July, 1984.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN LODHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. MN-47 of 1984, decided on 24th July, 1984.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN LODHI, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
UNITED BANK Ltd., MULTAN
VS
SHAHID RAFIQ
Law:
Section:
Industrial dispute- ---Resignation--Not finally accepted--Can be withdrawn--Bank employee making request for transfer and in alternative to accept his resignation--. Neither request for transfer nor resignation accepted and instead service terminated on unjustified reasons--Labour Court, in circumstances, held, rightly awarded re-instatement--Plea that having submitted resigns on such employee could not be re-instated--Rejected--Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 25-A A 38(3). Ch. Nazir Hussain for Appellant. Abdul Rafique for Respondent. Date of hearing: 15th July, 1984. JUDGMENT The decision, dated 23-1-1984 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 9. Multan has been challenged in this appeal, whereby the grievance petition of the respondent for his re-instatement in service was accepted. 2. The respondent was Officer Grade-Ill. He remained on sick leave upto 14-5-1979. He on 20-5-1979 made a written request for his transfer to Sahiwal and prayed in the alternative that if it was not possible, letter be treated as his resignation which may be accepted. The appellant neither transferred the respondent nor accepted his resignation but instead terminated his services for the reasons that without acceptance of his resignation he left his duties and did not clear the liabilities. The order is Exh. P.5, dated 7-10-1979. 3. The reasons given in Exh. P.5 of termination are not cogent and do not stand proved. No agreement on bond under which the respondent may have agrees to re-imburse the appellant for anything spent by the appellant upon the respondent, has been produced. There is no evidence why the respondent isβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492