Case Details

Citation(s)
1985 SLG 2267 1985 SLD 2267 1985 PLC 960
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Case No. 622/929 of 1984, decided on 12th May, 1985.
ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Ch. MUHAMMAD AYUB

VS

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT QF PUNJAB, EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT AND 3 OTHERS

Law:

Section:

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)- --S. 4 - Appeal against adverse remarks-Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer for about 6 months' tenure reported "No big seizure/detection during the period. The overall conduct remained just of approvable type only"-Facts and figures relating to seizure and recoveries indicating that performance of appellant was much better as compared to predecessor-Impugned remarks, in circum. stances, held, vague and contradictory hence expunged by Tribunal. Muhammad Aslam Sheikh for Appellant. A. G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondent. JUDGMENT Ch. Muhammad Ayub, Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer, Faisalabad has-made this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974, wherein he has impleaded the respondents mentioned ­above. 2. By virtue of this appeal the appellant has prayed that the adverse remark for the period from 9th January, 1983 to 30th June, 1983, as communicated to the appellant, vide memo. No. 811-84/414-E (E & T)-II, dated 3rd March, 1984 of the respondent No. 2, be expunged. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was conveyed the following adverse remarks vide memo. No. 811-84/414-E (E & T) 11, dated 3rd March, 1983, communicated by the Director-General, Excise and Taxation Punjab, Lahore for the period 9th January, 1983 to 30th June, 1983: - "No big seizure/detection during the period. The overall conduct of the official remained just of approvable type only." The appellant made a representation to the Director-General, Excise and Taxation, Punjab, Lahore on 8th April, 1984, and after waiting for 90 days be has filed this appeal. Hence this appeal. 4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the appellant that the adverse remarks communicated to the appellant are vague and contradictory. These are "No big seizure/detection during the period. The overall conduct of the official remained just of approvable type only." These remarks itself show that the work and conduct of the appellant was satisfactory and thus, he was not required to convey the aforementioned remarks which were not adverse remarks if reference is made to instruc­tions on the subject conveyed by…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492