Case Details

Citation(s)
1985 SLG 2255 1985 SLD 2255 1985 PLC 941
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Application No. 9 of 1985, decided on 30th April, 198$.
ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY AND MIAN FAIZ KARIM, MEMBERS

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

SH. MUHAMMAD YASIN

VS

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, OKARA AND OTHERS

Law:

Section:

Civil service- -- Disciplinary action-Breach of discipline, violation of conduct rules and instruction in violating normal channel by making com­plaints against superiors/colleague to higher authorities-Accused/ appellant dismissed from service on charges of making baseless complaints to higher authorities against superiors/colleagues and violation of normal channel of correspondence-Tribunal reaching conclusion that criminal case registered on basis of alleged complaint of accused hence his complaint was not baseless ­Accused, however, found guilty of breach of service conduct and discipline in submitting applications directly to higher authorities and such behaviour, held, cannot be allowed to go unnoticed but extreme punishment of dismissal, held, not justified-Tribunal, in circumstances, substituting penalty of dismissal with that of censure and stoppage of increment for two years and awarding reinstate­ment treating intervening period as leave of kind due-Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4. M. A. Riaz for Appellant. A. G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents. JUDGMENT ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY (MEMBER).-Sh. Muhammad Yasin, Ex-­Rural Development Worker/Secretary, Union Council No. 149, Shah Yakka, Tehsil Depalpur, District Okara has made this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, wherein he has impleaded the Assistant Director, Local Government and Rural Develop­ment, Okara and the Director, Local Government and Rural Development Lahore Division, Lahore as respondents. 2. By virtue of this appeal the appellant has prayed that the impugned order dated 12th November, 1983 be set aside and the appellant be re­instated in service, w. e. f. 12th November, 1983 with full back benefits of pay and allowances, etc. 3, Brief facts of the case are that the appellant started service as Secretary, Union Council, w. e. f. 16th September, 1960 and was absorbed in Government service, w. e. f. Ist November, 1973. In the year 1979 the appellant was suspended vide order, dated 13th August, 1979. However, the appellant has re-instated in service with a warning issued on 29th March, 1980. The appellant was again suspended on 23rd June,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492