Case Details

Citation(s)
1985 SLG 2133 1985 SLD 2133 1985 PLC 788
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Case No. 495/907 of 1984, decided on 16th December, 1984.
S. ABDUL, JABBAR KHAN, CHAIRMAN, ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY AND MIAN FAIZ KARIM, MEMBERS

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

NOOR AHMAD MIRZA

VS

GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB AND 3 OTHERS

Law:

Section:

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)- --S. 4-Adverse remarks-Assessment of work and conduct by reporting and countersigning officers fully justified-Service Tribunal in circumstances, declining to interfere with impugned adverse remarks. Amjad Ahmad Sheikh for Appellant. A. G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondent. JUDGMENT ABDUL JABBAR KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-Noor Ahmad Mirza, Magistrate 1st Class, Leiah, has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunal Act, 1974, in which he has impleaded the Government of the Punjab through Secretary, Services, General Administration and Information Department, Lahore, Commissioner, Bahawalpur Division, Bahawal­pur, Deputy Commissioner, Bahawalnagar and Assistant Commissioner, Fort Abbas. District Bahawalnagar, as respondents. 2. By virtue of this appeal he has prayed that the impugned adverse remarks recorded in his A. C. R. pertaining to the year 1982, be expunged. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant while working as Magistrate, Ist Class/E.A.C. Fort Abbas his A.C.R. for the year 1982, was recorded as under :­ "Integrity (a) Intellectual (b) Moral }Below average Behaviour with public (b) Counselling. He was advised to improve his attitude towards the Bar and safeguard his integrity he endeavoured-succeeded to some extent may improve further with the passage of time." (a) Overall Grading Meets bare minimum standard ... Below average. Fitness for promotion : ... Not yet fit for promo­tion. Remarks Recorded by the Countersigning officer His reputation was bad. As long as Mr. Farooqi was there to supervise him he remained under control but as soon as he left he opened up and started corruption." He filed a representation to the next higher authority which decided to retain these remarks. The appellant was informed accordingly by letter dated 9th May, 1984. Hence this appeal. 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned District Attorney assisted by the representative of the Department and have perused the entire record of this case including his dossier as well as comments of the countersigning authority, with their assistance. 5. According to the learned counsel…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492