| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1985 SLG 2008 1985 SLD 2008 1985 PLC 623 |
Service Tribunal, Balochistan
Service Appeal No. 14 of 1983, decided on 22nd August; 1984.
MR., JUSTICE ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHARY, CHAIRMAN, MUHAMMAD RAEES AND ILLAHI BAKHSH MALGHANI, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Service Appeal No. 14 of 1983, decided on 22nd August; 1984.
MR., JUSTICE ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHARY, CHAIRMAN, MUHAMMAD RAEES AND ILLAHI BAKHSH MALGHANI, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Raja MUHAMMAD AKRAM
VS
CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN
Law:
Section:
(a) Baluchistan Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1974- --S. 5 (2) & (3) - Show-cause notice - Regular enquiry-Two distinct procedures-Authorised Officer at the time of initiation of departmental- proceedings has to decide either to proceed under r. 5 (2) or r. 5 (3) and has to adopt one of the two courses-Cannot adopt both procedures simultaneously or one after the other Charge-sheet served-Enquiry conducted-Authorised Officer on consideration of - findings of enquiry proposing minor penalty Successor Authorised Officer (Chief Secretary) recommending issuance of show-cause notice for major penalty and after approval by Authority (Governor) serving such a notice and after personal hearing of accused recommending major penalty and such recommendation approved by Governor imposing penalty of removal from service-Held : (i) Successor Authority Officer could not sit in appeal on final decision of his predecessor, (ii) after receipt of inquiry report conducted in pursuance of procedure under r. 5 (2) after service of charge-sheet recourse to show-cause notice within meaning of r. 5 (3) was unwarranted and illegal-Findings of inquiry found by Tribunal as based upon no evidence and record not proving charges levelled against accused (appellant)-Service Tribunal in circumstances, instead of restricting its decision in setting aside impugned order and maintaining proceedings upto stage of recommendations made by first (original) Authorised Officer accepting appeal setting aside impugned order and directing reinstatement of appellant right from date of his suspension with all consequential benefits accruing under law-Baluchistan Service Tribunals Act (V of 1964), S. 4. Ch. Muhammad Latif v. Azad Government or the State of Jammu and Kashmir 1982 P L C (C S) 374 and 1983 P L C (C S) 80 rel. (b) Baluchistan Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975- --S. 5 (4) (b)-Action by Authority-Order of Authority must be supported by material on' record-Accused not held guilty of charge by Enquiry Officer-Authority bound to record grounds on which it differed from findings of enquiry. Iftikhar Muhammad with Ghulam Sarwar Malik for Appellant.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492