Law:

Section:

. Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---- ---Ss. 25-A & 38(3)---Termination of service purportedly due to abolition of post--No justification' for abolition of post--Services of workman (respondent) earlier terminated twice on different grounds but re-instated once in pursuance of writ petition and once under orders of Labour Court--Employer (appellant,) determined to get rid of him on supposed grounds--Order of Labour Court re-instating workman (respondent) in circumstances, upheld by Appellate Tribunal. Naeem Sultan Butt for Appellant. Date of hearing: 27th June, 1984. JUDGMENT The appeal captioned above challenges the decision dated 3-6-1984 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No.8, Bahawalpur, whereby the respon0ent has been directed to be reinstated in service. 2. The case has a checkered history. The respondent was previously dismissed on the allegation of inciting workers to go on strike. The order of dismissal was set aside in writ and fresh enquiry was allowed. The respondent was again dismissed but he was directed by the learned lower court to be reinstated. This time his services have been terminated on the plea of abolition of his post. The respondent is a qualified dispenser and was serving as resident doctor in the dispensary of the Mills. No ground for abolition of the post is given in the order of termination. However, in evidence it was said that the dispensary had been taken over by the Social Security,…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492