Law:

Section:

Civil service-- --- Termination of services during probation period--Work and conduct of appellant found quite unsatisfactory--Tribunal refused to interfere as no injustice was done. Hidayat Ullah for Appellant. Azam Rasul, District Attorney for Respondents. JUDGMENT ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY (MEMBER).-- Sikandar-e-Azam has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974 wherein he has impleaded the Secretary Food Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore. The Director, Food Department, Punjab, Lahore, and the Deputy Director, Food Department, Sargodha Region, Sargodha, as respondents. 2. By virtue of this appeal, the appellant has prayed that the order dated 11-6-1981, dispensing with the appellant's service may be set aside, with all back benefits. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was appointed as Junior Clerk in the Office of District Food Controller Sargodha on 13-3-1979. He resumed duty on 15-3-1979. His services were terminated w.e.f. 1-6-1981. The total service of the appellant works out to be 667 days, out of which he availed leave for 444 days and attended office for 223 days only. His work and conduct during the probation period remained unsatisfactory. His probation period was extended for 319 days to further watch his work and conduct. Even during the period of extension of the probation period, the work of the appellant was found quite unsatisfactory. The services of the appellant, during the probation period, were dispensed with, due to his unsatisfactory work and conduct by the Deputy Director Food, Sargodha, vide his order, dated 11-6-1981. The appellant made an appeal to the Director Food, Punjab, which was considered and rejected vide his order dated 29-5-1982. The appellant yet made another appeal to the Secretary to the Government of the Punjab, Food Department, which was rejected vide order dated 28-4-1983_ Hence this appeal. 4. We have heard the parties. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the appellant that a reference be made to Annexure 'A', with the appeal which shows that the appellant was allowed to seek admission in the Law College by the respondent No.3 with the condition that…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492