Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---- ---S.25-A--Temporarily promoted Assistant Electrical Engineer--Worked continuously for four years in that capacity--Denied regular promotion/ confirmation on ground that it was selection post and he could not be regularly promoted or confirmed without selection--No evidence on record to prove that it was a selection post--Held: Employee having practically proved his worth and ability was not responsible if selection was not held. Qazi Masood Ahmad for Appellant. Date of hearing: 9th February, 1982. JUDGMENT The facts giving rise to this appeal are that the respondent was promoted as Assistant Electrical Engineer (D) on 14-4-1977 in RNSP No.1l and .was working as such upto the time he brought grievance petition on 15-7-1980. He as yet has not been confirmed on the said post even though he is working on the said post for about four years. He claimed to be confirmed vide letter Exh. P-1. The case of the appellant is that the respondent was promoted temporarily so no question of confirmation arises, nor any question of completing the probationary period arises. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has set up new case in his arguments before me which is that the post of Assistant Electrical Engineer (D) is selection post and without selection the appellant could not be regularly promoted and since he was only temporarily promoted, the period of probation did not even start. I do not find any force in this argument. Firstly, there is nothing on the record to show that the post held by the respondent is selection post. No rule has been cited by him in support of his argument. Secondly, even if this is a selection post the respondent is not responsible if the selection Board has not been constituted or it exists and it has not held selection. The case of the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492