| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1984 SLG 946 1984 SLD 946 1984 SCMR 1413 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 147/P of 1983, decision dated: 25-10-1983 (On appeal from the judgment and order of Peshawar High Court dated 26-3-1983 passed in R.S.A. 14 of 1979)
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, ACTG. C.J. AND MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 147/P of 1983, decision dated: 25-10-1983 (On appeal from the judgment and order of Peshawar High Court dated 26-3-1983 passed in R.S.A. 14 of 1979)
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, ACTG. C.J. AND MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMADSADIQ
VS
. PIR DAD---Respondent
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-----Art.185(3)--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXVII-- Suit upon pronote--Contentions that impugned of High Court was based on incorrect inferences drawn from evidence and misreading of evidence --No evidence, found on record to support petitioner's case--Leave to appeal refused. Nazirullah, Advocate Supreme Court and Safdar Hussain, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing: 25th October, 1983. ORDER MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, J.-- This petition is directed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Peshawar High Courts dated 26-3-1983 passed in R.S.A. 14/1979. 2. Petitioner's case is that on 21-7-1977 Pir Dad plaintiff /respondent filed a suit in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mardan against the defendant /petitioner for the recovery of Rs.20,000 on the basis of a pronote, dated 30-6-1976. The suit was contested by the defendant/ petitioner on the ground that there was a bargain between the parties regarding the sale of 20 Kanals of land by the defendant /petitioner to the plaintiff /respondent for a sum of Rs.20,000 as the defendant/ petitioner was in urgent need of money. Subsequently, land measuring 20 Kanals was transferred by the defendant /petitioner through Mutation No-20038 and the pronote, in fact, pertained to the sale consideration of the land and was not regarding any…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492