Law:

Section:

Supreme Court Rules, 1980----O. XIV-Review-Petitioner's counsel admitting that nothing can be urged so far as legal requirements for review of an order passed by Supreme Court were concerned - Petition dismissed with certain observations.-[Review by Supreme Court]. Abid Hasan Minto, Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent. Date of hearing: 11th April, 1984. ORDER MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.-This Review Petition is directed against the order, dated 14-5-1983 whereby an application for restoration of a civil appeal which was dismissed for non-prosecution, was dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some discussion candidly admitted that nothing can be urged in so far as the legal requirements for the review of an order passed by this Court are concerned. He has however after highlighting the facts and circumstances of the case which were the subject-matter of the civil appeal and its dismissal for no prosecution which he said was unfortunate has pointed out that it was possible for this Court by virtue of its general powers under the rules, to take note of a redeeming feature; notwithstanding the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution and the failure of the application for restoration. He has in…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492