| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1984 SLG 375 1984 SLD 375 1984 SCMR 112 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 151 of 1980, decision dated: 7-05-1983 (From the judgment, dated 26-2-1979 of the Punjab Service Tribunal passed in Appeal No. 77/244 of 1978)
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH AND M. S. H. QURAISHI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Appeal No. 151 of 1980, decision dated: 7-05-1983 (From the judgment, dated 26-2-1979 of the Punjab Service Tribunal passed in Appeal No. 77/244 of 1978)
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH AND M. S. H. QURAISHI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ABDUR REHMAN--Appellant
VS
. THE SECRETARY, C & W DEPARTMENT---Respondent
Law:
Section:
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-Art. 212(3)-Bifurcation of one Department in two separate departments-Leave to appeal granted to consider question whether Government was justified in considering civil servant as ineligible to a post in one department despite the fact that both these departments at relevant time had combined seniority list.[civil service] (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973- -- Art. 212(3)-Civil service-Bifurcation of one department in two separate departments-Invitation of option to staff of bifurcated department-Purpose-Invitation, held, does not create any vested right in staff to allocation according to their wish. [civil service] Options are invited only to ascertain the wish of the concerned staff in order to accommodate them, as far as possible, according to their option but such invitation creates no -vested right in the staff to an allocation according to their wish, for, as is obvious if every one were to opt for one or the other Department, the Government could not possibly accommodate their option. The interest of public service has to be kept super most in such situations particularly where the staff has to be allocated and reallocated on account of organizational changes in the set-up. Raja Abdur Razzaq, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. M. A. Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent. Date of hearing 7th May, 1983, JUDGMENT M. S. H. QURAISHI, J.-This appeal by leave of the Court is directed against the order, dated 26-2-197.9 of the Punjab Service Tribunal, whereby the appellant's appeal was dismissed. 2. The appellant joined service on 13-5-1960 as a junior clerk in the office of the Chief Engineer, West Pakistan Buildings and Roads Department. On 30-9-1967, the Department was bifurcated into two separate Departments, namely, (1) Highways Department and, (2) Buildings Department. However, as a number of representations were received by the Department from the staff in regard to inter se seniority and prospects of promotion, etc., it was clarified by letter dated 17-2-1968 that the cadre of the various Services of the former B & R Department was still "joint" and that promotion…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492