| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1984 SLG 1860 1984 SLD 1860 1984 PLC 1381 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. D-297 of 1980, decided on 5th April, 1984.
AJMAL MIAN AND HAIDER ALI PIRZADA, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Constitutional Petition No. D-297 of 1980, decided on 5th April, 1984.
AJMAL MIAN AND HAIDER ALI PIRZADA, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
IMDAD KHAN
VS
SIND LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND 2 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)---- ---Art. 199 read with Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S. 38-Findings of fact-Not open to interference by High Court in constitutional jurisdiction-Labour Appellate Tribunal a Court of competent jurisdiction to give finding on question of fact i.e. whether or not petitioner seeking relief under S. 25-A of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 for re-instatement was in fact re-employed or not-Such findings of fact, held, cannot be interfered with by High Court in constitutional jurisdiction even if High Court were to take a different view on basis of evidence op record. All Amjad for Petitioner. Syed Qamruddin Hassan for Respondents. Date of hearing : 5th April, 1984, JUDGMENT AIMAL MIAN, J.-This is a petition against the order, dated 5th November, 1979 passed by the learned Sind Labour Appellate Tribunal in Appeals Nos. KAR 159/78 and KAR 189/78. The brief facts leading to the filing of the above petition are that the petitioner was employed with respondent No. 3 on temporary basis for a period of two months, with effect from 22nd July, 1975. Upon the expiry of above period of two months the services of the petitioner were terminated by a notice, dated 18th September, 1975, with effect from 19th September, 1975. It is the case of the petitioner that he was re-employed immediately thereafter. However, it is the case of respondent No. 3 that he was not re-employed. It seems that on 19th November, 1976 petitioner served a grievance notice under section 25-A of the 1.R.0. alleging therein, that his services were illegally terminated orally on 7th November, 1976. The above notice was replied to by respondent No. 3 on 1st February, 1976 wherein it was pointed out that the petitioner was employed temporarily for a period of two months and that his services were terminated by the above notice, dated 18th September, 1975 with effect from 19th September, 1975. The petitioner filed an application under section 25-A of the I.R.O. on 15th February, 1977 in the Vth Labour Court at Karachi. The above application was resisted by respondent No. 3. The learned Labour Court after recording the evidence and hearing the parties…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492