Case Details

Citation(s)
1984 SLG 1314 1984 SLD 1314 1984 PLC 659
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeal No. 7(L) of 1980, decided on 12th October, 1982,
A. O. RAZIUR REHMAN AND MUHAMMAD IRSHAD KHAN, MEMBERS

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ GRUMMAN

VS

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH THE FINANCIAL ADVISER, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS

Law:

Section:

(a) Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973- -- R. 4(a)(ii)-Penalty of stoppage of annual increment--Civil servant found abetting unlawful and illegitimate attempt-Civil servant, held, guilty of misconduct-Penalty of stoppage of annual increment for two years, held further, being appropriate rightly imposed. (b) Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973- -- R. 6-A-Revisional jurisdiction-Passing of order-Recording of good reasons-Although `Authority' is competent to call for record of a case in his revisional jurisdiction and pass such order as deem fit, yet order so passed be based on good reasons recorded. Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi for Appellant. Hafiz Tarfq Naseem for the State. Date of hearing : 18th September, 1982. JUDGMENT MUHPMMAD IRSHAD KHAN (MEMBER).-The appellant who was employed in the Office of Local Audit Officer (Army), Gujranwala Cantt during 1977, was charge-sheeted for the allegations that he failed to bring to the notice of the said Office the financial irregularities and deficiencies committed in 99-Medium Arty. which were disclosed to him by J.Q.M. of that regiment for seeking his help to cover the deficiency; and that be received Rs. 800 from J.Q.M. of 99-Medium Regiment Arty. for the purchase of rice to cover the deficiency occurred in the ration store on account of misappropriation. The appellant, in reply to the first charge, stated that the position was explained by him to his Group Superintendent, Mr. Muhammad Yousaf, as such he did not feel it necessary to bring the case to the notice of the Local Audit Office personally. In reply to the second charge the appellant submitted that his younger brother was a zamindar and was rice trader also. The J.Q.M. of 99-Medium Regiment Arty. asked the appellant to help him in pur­chasing some quantity of basmati rice from the appellant's brother and gave him an amount of Rs. 800 for payment to his younger brother as the cost of the rice, which were to be supplied by him. The appellant gave the amount to his younger brother but he did not agree to supply the rice at the rate of 100 per mound and returned the money to him who repaid the same to the said J.Q.M. The…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492