| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1984 SLG 1205 1984 SLD 1205 1984 PLC 485 |
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeal No. 190 (R) of 1981, decided on 24th January, 1984.
JUSTICE SHAH ABDUR RASHID, CHAIRMAN. BRIG. (RETD.) ABDUR RASHID AND RAZIUR REHMAN, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. 190 (R) of 1981, decided on 24th January, 1984.
JUSTICE SHAH ABDUR RASHID, CHAIRMAN. BRIG. (RETD.) ABDUR RASHID AND RAZIUR REHMAN, MEMBERS
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
RAB NAWAZ KHAN
VS
SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND ANOTHER
Law:
Section:
(a) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)- -- S. 4 (1) (a)-Exhausting departmental remedy-Representation to next higher authority-Representation by aggrieved civil servant to same authority which passed impugned order or to some other authority other than one to whom it should have been made-Said authority bound to forward such representation to correct authority-Failure on part of aggrieved civil servant to send his representation to correct authority-Shall not debar him from approaching Tribunal. (b) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)- -- S. 4-Appeal before Tribunal--Limitation-In response of departmental representation appellant informed "since the case has gone to the Service Tribunal we will wait for their decision"-Such order, held, could be interpreted either as a rejection of representation or as an order postponing a decision-Advantage, in circumstances, held, must go to appellant and such order be treated as postponement of decision-No decision having been communicated within 90 days appeal already filed, in circumstances, held, matured after expiry of 90 days from date of representation. (c) Civil service- -- Passing of test entitling special pay-Effect of termination due to retrenchment and subsequent re-appointment as fresh entrant on such passing of a test-Lower Division Clerk entitled under rules to benefit of two advance increments on passing typing test-Test passed in 1960 and benefit enjoyed-Services terminated due to retrenchment in 1974-Re-appointed as fresh entrant in 1980-Claiming benefit of two advance increments on basis of test passed in 1960Held [Per A.O. Raziur Rahman (Member): Prerequisite of passing test laid down to ensure admissibility of advance increments only to those knowing typing of a certain minimum standard ; passing of requisite test earlier would suffice for purposes of entitling the benefit even on fresh appointment-[Per Brig. Abdur Rashid, Member and endorsed by Chairman] : Anything happening before discharge of official in 1974 would be a closed chapter and any allusion thereto not relevant ; Having passed requisite test 20 years ago would be quite irrelevant on fresh appointment and benefit could not be claimed…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492