Law:

Section:

(a) Evidence Act (I of 1872)-of -- S. 1 t.5-Estoppel-No estoppel against law.-[Estoppel]. R. T. H. Janjua's case P L D 1974 S C 146 ref. (b) Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordi­nance (XIII of 1978) -- Ss. 3 & 5-Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), rt. 9 and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts, 212 & 260-Interpretation and import of section 5 Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1978-Service of Corporation declared to be service of Pakistan under section 5 of Ordinance and persons employed in such Corporation termed by legal fiction to be civil servants for purposes of Service Tribunals Act, 1973-Section 5, held, firstly determines status of employees of Corporation that they shall have same right as persons in service of Pakistan in their service matters and secondly providing remedies to persons removed from service under section 3-Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4. Farid Ahmad v. Karachi Shipyard and Engineering Works Ltd. and another P L D 1983 Kar.576 rel. (c) Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981) - -- Arts. 13 & 9.-Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation Act (XXXII of 1973), Ss. 12 & 19-Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation Employees (Retirement from Service) Regulations. 1980, Regulation 3 ­Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978), Ss. 3 & 5-Interpretation of Art. 13, Provisional Constitution Order. (1 of 1981)-Compulsory retirement-Jurisdiction, ouster of-Competent authority-Order of retirement of civil servant not warranting`) "' interference on merits-Necessity of going into question of interpretation of Art. 13 not arising-Competent authority in respect of petitioner's retirement being appointing authority and petitioner retired by appointing authority-Order of retirement neither violat­ing relevant law nor powers available for retirement exercised for reasons extraneous to relevant law or being result of any personal vendetta or bias-Contention that order of retirement passed mala fide, held, has no merit. Syed Mahmood v. Pakistan Railways Board and another 1982 P L C (C. S.) 231 rel. Ch. Muhammad Farooq for Petitioner, Munir A.…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492