Case Details

Citation(s)
1984 SLG 1019 1984 SLD 1019 1984 PLC 76
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeal No. 78(P) of 1982, decided on 27th September, 1983.
MR., JUSTICE SHAH ABDUR RASHID, CHAIRMAN AND A. O. RAZIUR REHMAN, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

SYED SHAH

VS

CHAIRMAN, WAPDA AND ANOTHER

Law:

Section:

(a) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)- --S. 4 read with West Pakistan Water and Power Development Autho­rity Act (XXXI of 1958), S. 17(1-A) & 17 (1-C)-Jurisdiction of Service Tribunal-Order of retirement passed under S. 17(1-A) of West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act, 1958-Open to appeal before Tribunal-Tribunal unlike extraordinary discre­tionary jurisdiction of High Court in a writ petition when impugned order without lawful authority or jurisdiction has same jurisdiction which a departmental authority possesses- in passing original or appellate order and can interfere even on question of facts-Jurisdic­tion of Tribunal in deciding appeal in no way limited by any pro­vision of law or Constitution-Contention that unlike in case of removal from service with stigma an order of retirement was not open to appeal before Tribunal-Repelled-Section. 17(1-A), held, though does not require assigning any reason for removing neverthe­less does not say that employee can be removed or retired without any reason-Instructions and guidelines laid down by Authority in order to stop indiscriminate recommendations by Superior Officers for removal or retirement to be kept in view--Retirement based upon one adverse entry "living beyond his means"- Such report not countersigned and also contrary to report given by some officer cover­ing that period also and grading appellant employee very high and recommending for accelerated promotion-Very action of Reporting Officer in changing his opinion and writing a report for a part of period twice and not getting it signed by Countersigning Officer, in circumstances, held, amounts to mala fide-Impugned retirement order, in circumstances, held, not justified hence set aside.-[Abdul Shakoor v. WAPDA P L D 1983 Lah. 404 dissented from]. Mian Mahmood v. Chairman, WAPDA 1983 P L C (C. S.) 556; M. Yamin Qureshi v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan P L D 1980 S C 22 and M. Aslant Bajwa v. Federation of Pakistan P L D 1974 Lah. 545 rel. Lt.-Col. Farzand Ali and others v. Province of West Pakistan through the Secretary Department of Agriculture, Government of West Pakistan, Lahore P L D 1970 S C 98 and A. M. K. Leghari v.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492