| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1984 SLG 1019 1984 SLD 1019 1984 PLC 76 |
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeal No. 78(P) of 1982, decided on 27th September, 1983.
MR., JUSTICE SHAH ABDUR RASHID, CHAIRMAN AND A. O. RAZIUR REHMAN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. 78(P) of 1982, decided on 27th September, 1983.
MR., JUSTICE SHAH ABDUR RASHID, CHAIRMAN AND A. O. RAZIUR REHMAN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
SYED SHAH
VS
CHAIRMAN, WAPDA AND ANOTHER
Law:
Section:
(a) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)- --S. 4 read with West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act (XXXI of 1958), S. 17(1-A) & 17 (1-C)-Jurisdiction of Service Tribunal-Order of retirement passed under S. 17(1-A) of West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act, 1958-Open to appeal before Tribunal-Tribunal unlike extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction of High Court in a writ petition when impugned order without lawful authority or jurisdiction has same jurisdiction which a departmental authority possesses- in passing original or appellate order and can interfere even on question of facts-Jurisdiction of Tribunal in deciding appeal in no way limited by any provision of law or Constitution-Contention that unlike in case of removal from service with stigma an order of retirement was not open to appeal before Tribunal-Repelled-Section. 17(1-A), held, though does not require assigning any reason for removing nevertheless does not say that employee can be removed or retired without any reason-Instructions and guidelines laid down by Authority in order to stop indiscriminate recommendations by Superior Officers for removal or retirement to be kept in view--Retirement based upon one adverse entry "living beyond his means"- Such report not countersigned and also contrary to report given by some officer covering that period also and grading appellant employee very high and recommending for accelerated promotion-Very action of Reporting Officer in changing his opinion and writing a report for a part of period twice and not getting it signed by Countersigning Officer, in circumstances, held, amounts to mala fide-Impugned retirement order, in circumstances, held, not justified hence set aside.-[Abdul Shakoor v. WAPDA P L D 1983 Lah. 404 dissented from]. Mian Mahmood v. Chairman, WAPDA 1983 P L C (C. S.) 556; M. Yamin Qureshi v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan P L D 1980 S C 22 and M. Aslant Bajwa v. Federation of Pakistan P L D 1974 Lah. 545 rel. Lt.-Col. Farzand Ali and others v. Province of West Pakistan through the Secretary Department of Agriculture, Government of West Pakistan, Lahore P L D 1970 S C 98 and A. M. K. Leghari v.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492