Law:

Section:

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-----Art. 185(3)--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.304, Part 1--Murder-­Evidence- -Points raised pertaining merely to appreciation of evidence-­High Court found to have considered case of petitioner in depth before arriving at its conclusion--No interference called for--Leave to appeal refused. --[Evidence] Petitioner in person. Nemo for the State. Date of hearing: 31st January, 1984. ORDER M.S.H. QURAISHI, J.-- Mr. Waheed-ud-Din Virk, who had been the petitioner's counsel, states that as the petitioner has taken away the brief from him, he would seek, permission to withdraw from the case. Permission is granted. The petitioner, who is present in person, has argued the case himself, 2. The petitioner had been convicted by the trial Court under section 304, Part 1, P . P . C for causing the death of Abdur Rehman deceased and sentenced to R.I. for ten years and to a fine of Rs.5,000 or in default in payment thereof, to R.I. for two years, with the direction that the fine, if realized, should be paid as compensation to the heirs of the deceased. On appeal, the learned Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court altered his conviction from Part I to Part II of section 304 and reduced the sentence to R.I. for five years and a fine of Rs. 2,500 or in default in payment thereof to R.I. for one year. Benefit under section 382-B, Cr.P.C. was also given to him. Not satisfied, he has moved this Court for leave to appeal. 3. The occurrence followed a dispute over demolition of a wall which had led to quarrel, exchange of abuses and grappling in the course of which the petitioner and his brother had received minor injuries. Although the parties were separated, the petitioner fetched a gun from his house and fired, resulting in injury to Abdur Rehman…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492