Case Details

Citation(s)
1983 SLG 568 1983 SLD 568 1983 PLD 466
Lahore High Court
Civil Revision No. 875 of 1980, decided on 13th April, 1983.
M. MEHBOOB AHMAD, J
Ch. Mahammad Hassan for Petitioner. Ch. M. A. Salim for
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. C. M. Latif for
Respondents Nos. 3 to 10.

ABDUL SATTAR AND others

VS

ABDUL SHAKOOR AND others--Respondents

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- -- Ss. 100 & 115-Finding on issue of fact in second appeal, held, can be impugned only if illegality in form of gross misreading of record or omission to consider material evidence on record is established. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- Ss. 100 & 115-Revision-Issue of fact-Appreciation of evidence in one form or other by courts below on issue of fact specially when findings are concurrent not open to challenge in second appeal much less in a revision.-[Finding of fact]. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- S. 115-Loans for Agricultural Purposes Act (XLII of 1973), S. 4, subsections (4), (5) & (6)-Land, ownership of-Petitioners bringing on record mutation of sale, record of rights and testimony of one of petitioners appearing as a witness-Mutation of sale cancelled property having been mortgaged with Agricultural Development Bank at time of sale in due process which was challenged by petitioner in appeal or revision before revenue heirarchy nor in suit out of which revision arising-Testimony of witness also highly discrepant-Veracity and correctness of mutation of sale, held, stood affected. Chief Land Commissioner and another v. Maula Dad and others 1978 S C M R 264 rel. (d) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)- S. 54-Oral sale of property-Onus lying heavily on petitioner to prove validity of sale for consideration-Quantum of consideration different in mutation and in plaint as well as in oral statement on oath-Contradictions given weight and sale, held, not valid in circumstances. (e) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)- S. 54-Sale of property-Cancellation of mutation of sale-Contradiction brought out in cross-examination of witness regarding mutation, quantum of consideration, complete ignorance of petitioner about mortgage of property in dispute and failure to take steps to have property redeemed on payment of mortgage money to establish bona fide title in property and sleeping over matter for a long time, held, lend support to finding that no valid sale took place in favour of petitioner. (f) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)- S. 54-Revision-Sale of property in favour of petitioner-Certain…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492