Case Details

Citation(s)
1983 SLG 544 1983 SLD 544 1983 PLD 326
Lahore High Court
Regular First Appeal No. 224 of 1978, decided on 13th February, 1983
GHULAM MUJADDID MIRZA AND MAZHARUL HAQ, JJ
Zia Mahmood Mirza with M. Sadiq Abbasi for Appellant. Maulvi Siraj-ul-Hay with Mahmood-ul-Hassan Awan for
Respondent.

PAKISTAN--Appellant

VS

PAK CHROME LEATHER COMPANY LTD.--Respondent

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) --- S. 20--Suit-Territorial jurisdiction-Even if first Court having no territorial jurisdiction, trying case upon merits, calling upon all available evidence, hearing and trial have been satisfactory as a matter of procedure and decision appearing to be right, question of territorial jurisdiction is relegated to obscurity.-[Jurisdiction]. Mian Fazal Muhammad Nizam-ud-Din Baig & Co. v. The Province of West Pakistan and others P L D 1969 Lab. 453 ; Pokhar Mal Ram Nath through Lala Sant Ram v. Khanewal Oil Mills A I R 1945 Lab. 260; Muhammad Esuff Rowther v. M. Hateem & Co. A I R 1934 Mad. 581 and Pakistan & Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways, Rawalpindi v. M. Faiz Ahmad N L R 1978 Civil 1186 ref. Lachha Ram v. Virji and others A I R 1921 Ali. 66 fol. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- -- O. III, r. 1-Suit-Contention that suit against appellant not filed properly in trial Court as person instituting same was not duly authorized by respondent to do so-Contention, held, not tenable as onus to prove same was on appellant before trial Court.-[Burden of proof]. Khan Iftikhar Hussain Khan of Mamdot v. Messrs Ghulam Nabi Corporation Ltd., Lahore P L 0 1971 S C 550 ref. (c) Evidence Act (t of 1872)- -- S. 101-Onus to prove-Contention that respondent Company and another Company being sister concerns having one Director and one family running both firms, respondent owing money to appellant, withholding amount and adjusting same in lieu thereof by appellant, a justified action-Onus of proving other Company as sister concern, on appellant and appellant failing to discharge onus-Contention, held, not tenable, in circumstances-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 1 .0.-[Burden of proof]. Mst. Mulkhan Bibi v. Muhammad Wazir Khan P L D 1959 (W. P.) Lab. 710 ; E. B. M. Company Ltd. v. Dominion Bank A I R 1937 P C 279 and J. H. Pattinson and others v. Bindhya Deb! A I R 1933 Pat. 196 ref. (d) Evidence Act (I of 1872)- -- S. 101 - Onus - Whether A Company a sister concern of respondent Company, onus to prove such a question lie on appellant before trial Court and cannot be raised before High Court in appeal Civil…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492