| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1983 SLG 541 1983 SLD 541 1983 PLD 294 |
Lahore High Court
Regular Second Appeal No. 990 of 1969, decided on 9th May, 1982
GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN AND FAZAL-E-MAHMOOD, JJ
Sh. Ghias Muhammad for Appellant. Mahraj-ud-Din for
Respondent.
Regular Second Appeal No. 990 of 1969, decided on 9th May, 1982
GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN AND FAZAL-E-MAHMOOD, JJ
Sh. Ghias Muhammad for Appellant. Mahraj-ud-Din for
Respondent.
ANJUMAN TALIMULISLAM (READ.), SHEIKHUPURA---Appellant
VS
PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN PUNJAB PROVINCE AND 2 others--Respondents
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ---- O. V1, r. 17-Amendm; nt of plaint-Finding as a fact that appellant was not in possession of disputed land, courts to provide appellant with an opportunity to amend plaint. Karamat Ali v. Muhammad Yunus Haft P L D 1963 S C 161 ; Ahmad Din v. Muhammad Shafi P L D 1971 S C 762 and Niaz Hussain v. Imdad Hussain P L D 1965 Lab. 172 ref. (b) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912~ -- S. 36-Ouster of jurisdiction-Civil Court-Ouster of jurisdiction not to be presumed or readily admitted despite a clear ouster in a particular law, there are situations in which jurisdiction can be exercised.-[Jurisdiction]. Aslam Zia P L D 1958 S C 104 ; Karim Dad v. Arif,Ali etc. P L-D 1978 Lab. 679 ; Jewana v. Mst. Sakhi P L D 1954 Lab. 253 ; and Government of Punjab v. Harbhagwan and another 1940 P L R 529 ref. (c) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)- -) S. 36-Ouster of jurisdiction-Civil court-Jurisdiction can only be ousted, if found that order passed by statutory functionary lay within ambit of its power and neither based on fraud nor mala fides.[jurisdiction]. Aslam Zia P L D 1958 S C 104 ; Karim Dad v. Arif All etc. P L D 1978 Lah. 679 ; Jewana v. Mst. Sakhi P L D 1954 Lab. 253 .and Government of Punjab v. Harbhagwan and another 1940 P L R 529 ref. (d) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)- --- S. 24-Grant of proprietary rights-Interference-Collector, held, after grant of proprietary rights to a purchaser, has no power to impose conditions having no basis in law. Muhammad Din and others v. Imam Din A I R 1948 P C 33 and Government of Punjab v. Harbhagwan and another 1940 P L R 529 ref. (e) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)- S. 16-Grant of proprietary rights-Interference-Limitation-Even if a tenant procures an allotment by deceipt, he cannot be proceeded against after expiry of 3 years.-[Limitation]. Habibullah Khan v. Province of West Pakistan P L D 1967 Lab. 52 ref. (f ) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)- -- S. 15--Interpretation-Before executing a sale-deed and conferring proprietary rights, Collector to see that purchase money…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492