Case Details

Citation(s)
1983 SLG 541 1983 SLD 541 1983 PLD 294
Lahore High Court
Regular Second Appeal No. 990 of 1969, decided on 9th May, 1982
GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN AND FAZAL-E-MAHMOOD, JJ
Sh. Ghias Muhammad for Appellant. Mahraj-ud-Din for
Respondent.

ANJUMAN TALIMULISLAM (READ.), SHEIKHUPURA---Appellant

VS

PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN PUNJAB PROVINCE AND 2 others--Respondents

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ---- O. V1, r. 17-Amendm; nt of plaint-Finding as a fact that appellant was not in possession of disputed land, courts to provide appellant with an opportunity to amend plaint. Karamat Ali v. Muhammad Yunus Haft P L D 1963 S C 161 ; Ahmad Din v. Muhammad Shafi P L D 1971 S C 762 and Niaz Hussain v. Imdad Hussain P L D 1965 Lab. 172 ref. (b) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912~ -- S. 36-Ouster of jurisdiction-Civil Court-Ouster of jurisdiction not to be presumed or readily admitted despite a clear ouster in a particular law, there are situations in which jurisdiction can be exercised.-[Jurisdiction]. Aslam Zia P L D 1958 S C 104 ; Karim Dad v. Arif,Ali etc. P L-D 1978 Lab. 679 ; Jewana v. Mst. Sakhi P L D 1954 Lab. 253 ; and Government of Punjab v. Harbhagwan and another 1940 P L R 529 ref. (c) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)- -) S. 36-Ouster of jurisdiction-Civil court-Jurisdiction can only be ousted, if found that order passed by statutory functionary lay within ambit of its power and neither based on fraud nor mala fides.[jurisdiction]. Aslam Zia P L D 1958 S C 104 ; Karim Dad v. Arif All etc. P L D 1978 Lah. 679 ; Jewana v. Mst. Sakhi P L D 1954 Lab. 253 .and Government of Punjab v. Harbhagwan and another 1940 P L R 529 ref. (d) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)- --- S. 24-Grant of proprietary rights-Interference-Collector, held, after grant of proprietary rights to a purchaser, has no power to impose conditions having no basis in law. Muhammad Din and others v. Imam Din A I R 1948 P C 33 and Government of Punjab v. Harbhagwan and another 1940 P L R 529 ref. (e) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)- S. 16-Grant of proprietary rights-Interference-Limitation-Even if a tenant procures an allotment by deceipt, he cannot be proceeded against after expiry of 3 years.-[Limitation]. Habibullah Khan v. Province of West Pakistan P L D 1967 Lab. 52 ref. (f ) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)- -- S. 15--Interpretation-Before executing a sale-deed and conferring proprietary rights, Collector to see that purchase money…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492