Case Details

Citation(s)
1983 SLG 49 1983 SLD 49 1983 PTD 298 (1983) 48 TAX 16
Delhi High Court
Income tax References Nos. 224 and 225 of 1972, decision dated: 7-04-1981
BAFORE S. RANGANATHAN AND MS. LEILA SETH, JJ
Bafore S. Ranganathan and Ms. Leila Seth, JJ M. L. Verma for the Assessee. IG IG Wadhera with P. N. Misra for the Commissioner

SWAP AN YASH

VS

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Law: Income Tax Act, 1961

Section: 154

(a ) Income-tax--Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from record--Firm-­Assessee partner of firm -- Mistake discovered from assessment of firm in respect of partner-Individual assessment of partner cannot be rectified on that basis. (b) Income-tax- Appeal -- Jurisdiction - Order passed without jurisdiction - No, objection raised before Assessing Officer - Objection can be raised in appeal. I. T. O. v. S. K. Habibullah (1962) 44 I T R 809 (S C) ; Second Addl. I. T. O. v. Atmala Nagaraj (1962) 46 I T R 609 (S C) ; Hanaraj Dhingra v. Union of India (1975) 98 I T R 397 (Cal.) and Continental Commercial Carpn. v. I. T. O. (19 7 a) 100I T R 170 (Mad.), fol. C. L T. v. Ohkarmal Meghraj (HUF) (1974) 93 I T R 233 (S C); C. I. T v Rashid (K. S.) (1972) 85 I T R 118 (S C); C. I. T. (Addl.) v. Shree Shankar ds­Co. (1979) 118I T R 636 (Mad.); Devendra Prakash v. I. T. O. (1969) 72 I T R 151 (Ail.) affirming (1963) 47 I T R 5()1; Basari Mal Kuthiala (L.) v. I. T. O. (1961) 41 I T R 12 (S C); L T. O. v. Devinatha Nadar (T. S.) (1968) 68 I T R 252 (S C); Lak'hminarayana Chetty (Kamenarlapudl) v. I. T. O. (First Addl.) (1959) 29 I T R 419 (A P) and Rain Bhagat v. C. I. T. (1.966) 61 w T R 146 (Punj.) ref. JUDGMENT RANGANATHAN, J.-These are two income-tax references at the instance of the same assessee. They relate to the assessment years 1963-64 and 1964-65. The relevant previous years were the financial years 1962-63 and 1963-64. The references arise under identical circumstances and the questions of law referred to us are common in respect of both the assessment years. They read as follows: "(1) Whether, on the facts and in. the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that non-inclusion of the share income of the minor arising from the firm in which the assessee is a partner in the bands of the assessee, is a mistake capable of being rectified under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the orders passed by the Income-tax Officer under section 155 of the Act can be treated as orders passed under section 154 of the Act?" The assessee,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492