Case Details

Citation(s)
1983 SLG 347 1983 SLD 347 1983 SCMR 1299
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1980, decision dated: 2-10-1983.(From the judgment, dated 13-06-1974 of the Lahore High Court passed in Regular Second Appeal No. 234 of 1962)
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, SHAFIUR RAHMAN, M. S. H. QURAISHI AND MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, JJ
Qazi Khalid Iqbal, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate on-Record (absent) for Appellant. Ch. Muhammad Abdul Wahid, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate on-Record for
Respondent No. 1

UMAR DIN

VS

M. HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER

Law:

Section:

(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)----Art. 185 (3) Pre emption Leave to appeal granted to consider whether death of vendor in a pre emption appeal could result in its abatement. [Pre emption Abatement]. (b) Punjab Pre emption Act (I of 1913) ----S. 21 Vendor not necessary party in pre emption suit Failure to implead vendor as necessary party, held, not fatal to suit. Hira Lal v. Ramjas I L R 6 All. 57 ; Shiv Charan Singh v. The Secretary of State for India and another 1888 P R 80 ; Harbans Tiwari v. Tota Sahu and others I L R 32 All. 14 and Nasir v. Muhammad v. Fazal P L D 1965 Lah. 434 ref. (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ---Art. 185(3) Point not specifically raised before High Court¬-Permitted to be raised at appeal stage by Supreme Court where High Court had not applied law correctly to case. JUDGMENT M. S. H. QURAISHI, J. This appeal by leave of the Court is directed against the order, dated 13 6 974 of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court whereby the appellant's Regular Second Appeal No. 234 of 1962 was consigned to the record as having abated on his failure to have brought on record the legal representatives of Mst. Sharfan, the vendor in the case. 2. The second appeal before the High Court had arisen out of a suit instituted by M. Hussain, respondent No. 1, to pre empt the sale of a house made by Mst. Sharfan in favour of the appellant. On 13 6 1974 when that appeal came up for hearing, it was shown, by production of a copy of entry in the register of death, that Mst. Sharfan had died on 20 3 1972 and as no application had been made to implead her legal representatives, the impugned order was passed. The appellant then moved a petition before this Court whereupon leave was granted to consider whether the death of the vendor in a pre emption appeal could result in its abatement. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that under Order XXII, rule 4, C. P. C. as then in force read with Article 177 of the Limitation Act, the second appeal could abate only if no application for impleading the legal representatives of the deceased had been moved within 90 days from the date of the death but that as before the expiry of this period the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492