| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1983 SLG 1870 1983 SLD 1870 1983 PLC 992 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. 84 (R) of 1983, decided on 29th June, 1983.
MR., JUSTICE SHAH ABDUR RASHID, CHAIRMAN AND A. O. RAZIUR REHMAN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. 84 (R) of 1983, decided on 29th June, 1983.
MR., JUSTICE SHAH ABDUR RASHID, CHAIRMAN AND A. O. RAZIUR REHMAN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Mst. SURRIYA BEGUM
VS
DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), FAMILY PLANNING BOARD, N.W.F.P., PESHAWAR AND 17 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of.1973)- --- S. 4-Appeal before Tribunal-Limitation - Reply to departmental appeal not received-Appeal to be filed within 30 days after waiting for a period of 90 days i.e. total limitation period of 120 days.-Letter received thereafter intimating that departmental appeal had previously been rejected-Cannot extend limitation. M. S. Siddiqi for Appellant. Date of hearing, 28th June, 1983. JUDGMENT SHAH ABDUR RASHID (CHAIRMAN).--The appellant was an employee of the Population Planning Board, N.-W.F.P., and then of the Population Planning Division of the Federal Government. Her services were terminated under section 6 of the Population Welfare Planning Programme (Appointment and Termination of Service) Ordinance, 1981, by order dated 20-9-1982. She alleges that she filed a departmental appeal on 1-10-1982 from the order of termination, but did not receive any reply and consequently filed the present appeal before the Tribunal under section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973 on 6-4-1983. If this was end of the matter, the present appeal was time-barred, inasmuch as after waiting for the statutory period of 90 days, the appellant should have come to the Tribunal within 30 days i.e. on or before 1-2-1983. The present appeal, having been filed on 6-4-1.983, was thus late by over two months. However, the learned counsel for the appellant contends that during the pendency of appeal, a reply dated 5-6-1983, was received and, therefore, the appellant got a fresh cause of action to file the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492