Law:

Section:

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)-- ---S. 2 (i) & S. O. 12 read with Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 25-A & 38-Grievance petition against termination of service-Petitioner whether a workman with reference to nature of duties - Termination of service whether simpliciter or for misconduct-Evidence on record not sufficient for determination of issues-Order of Labour Court, in circumstances, set aside and case remanded by Appellate Tribunal for decision afresh after opportunity of evidence to parties. Nitamuddin Baloch for Appellant. Sheikh Amanullah for Respondent. Date of hearing: 7th April, 1982. ORDER The respondent, who was appointed as Assistant Security Inspector in the appellant mills, with effect from 7-5-1979, was suspended vide order, dated 31-12-1980 and was charge-sheeted on the same day for negligence in connection with loss of electric motor from the premises of the appellant mills, while the proceedings for taking disciplinary action against the respondent were pending, he was transferred to the Fire Fighting Department on or about 1-2-1982. While he was posted in the Fire Fighting Department, his services were terminated on 1 month's notice vide order dated 9-5-1981. Aggrieved by the termination of his service, the respondent filed a grievance petition before the learned VIIth Labour Court. His grievance petition has been allowed by the learned Labour Court which has directed vide its decision, given on 14-11-1981, that he be re-instated in service with full back benefits. 2. I have heard Mr. Nizamuddin Baloch, Advocate, who appeared for the appellant and Mr. Shaikh Amanullah, the learned counsel for the respondent workman. Both the learned counsel agreed that for the purposes of determining whether the Standing Orders are…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492