Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-- -- Ss. 1 (3) (f ), 25-A & 37 = Employee of Social Security Dispensary seeking, redress against removal from service-Petition dismissed by Labour Court holding that Dispensary being exempt under S. 1 (3) (f) Labour Court had no jurisdiction - Hospitals, held, though exempt but if dispensary was a part of Social Security Institution and not a separate and independent establishment it would not be exempted-Division of Labour Court in circumstances, set aside and case remanded for re-decision after obtaining evidence on point whether or not such dispensary was, a separate entity. Ch. Fazal Elahi for Appellant. Iftikhar Ahmad Dar for Respondents. Date of hearing : 15th March, 1983. JUDGMENT This appeal arises from the decision dated 29-7-1982 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, .Punjab Lahour Court No. 7, Gujranwala, whereby the grievance petition of the appellant for his re-instatement in service was dismissed, holding that since he was employed in the dispensary which is exempted under clause (f) of section: I : (3) of . the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the Labour Court had no jurisdiction- The learned lower Court relied upon its own previous decision given in the case `Laviza Bibi v. Social Security Institution, decided on 3-6-1981. 2. This is true - that hospitals have been exempted under section 1 (3) (f ) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, but it is yet to be determined if the dispensary…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492