Case Details

Citation(s)
1983 SLG 1532 1983 SLD 1532 1983 PLC 434
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No. HYD-39 of 1982, heard on 21st October, 1982-
Z. A. CHANNA, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN

VS

FAROOQ ARMED MEMON

Law:

Section:

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)­-- -- S. 25-A (1)-Grievance notice-Limitation-Rules applicable to establishment providing appeal-Workmen preferring appeal within time prescribed for such appeal-Limitation for purpose of grievance notice to employer, in circumstances, held, would run from com­munication of decision on appeal -Workman would thus not only be aggrieved by original order but also from order in appeal. Chairman, S. R. T. C. v: B7kshal and 27 others 1980 P L C 735 Muhammad Saleem v. Chairman, K. P. T. 1981 P L C 184 ; Vice-Chairman, Pakistan Railways v. S. Jaffer Abbas 1981 P L C 347 ; Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railway v. Mrs. Nasim Sadiq 1981 P L C 653 and S. R. T. C. v. Raja Muhammad Baksh 1981 P L C 905 rel. (b) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)---- --- S. O. 15 (4)-Domestic enquiry-No particular mode laid down by law -Can be held in any manner convenient to Enquiry Officer and parties-Accused workman to be given fair and reasonable opportu­nity of defence --Principles of natural justice not violated -Record­ing statements of accused and witnesses in question and answer form =Itself neither violative of law nor of principles of natural justice unless it can be shown that same caused prejudice to accused work­man: United Bank Limited, Sukkur v. . Munir Ahmed 1982 P L C 260 distinguished. (c) Industrial dispute--- -- Domestic enquiry-.Non-supply of copy of findings of enquiry-Does not invalidate consequential punishment order unless such report of findings contains material extraneous to charges or any thing in addition to original allegation or other substantial defect which could have prejudiced accused's case. Riaz Ahmed Shah v. Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal 1980 P L C 459 ref. Dawood Cotton Mills v. Guftar Shah and another P L D 1981 S C 225. rel. Mamoon Kazi for Appellant. M. Bashir Awan for Respondent. Date of hearing: 21st October, 1982. ORDER The respondent, who was posted as cashier at the Var Branch, Thatta, of the National Bank of Pakistan, the appellant herein, was dismissed from service, vide order, dated 24th July, 1980, on the charges of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492