Case Details

Citation(s)
1983 SLG 1505 1983 SLD 1505 1983 PLC 395
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Case No. 648/1486 of 1981, decided on 4th December, 1982.
S. ABDUL, JABBAR KHAN, CHAIRMAN, MALIK ZAWWAR HUSSAIN AND ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY, MEMBERS

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MAMOONUR-RASHID

VS

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER

Law:

Section:

Civil service----- --Pay-Revision of Pay Scales-Option to be exercised-Should not be conditional-Official opting for National Pay Scales introduced in 1977 but considering old pay scales more beneficial and kept on drawing same regularly-Option beset with many riders in order to gain benefits from both ends-Such option, held, rightly not treated as proper option. Haroon-ur-Rashid for Appellant. Haroon-ur-Rashid Cheema, District Attorney for Respondent. JUDGMENT S. ABDUL JABBAR KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-Mr. Mamoon-ur-Rashid, Headmaster, Government Pak Land Middle School, Shad Bagh, Lahore, has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act of 1974 in which he has impleaded Secretary to Government of the Punjab, Education Department, Lahore, and District Education Officer, Lahore, as respondents. 2. By virtue of this appeal, he has prayed that respondent No. 1 be directed to fix appellants pay in Revised National Pay Scales and respondent No. 2 be directed to restore Dearness Allowances permissible to him under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was working as Headmaster, Government Pak Land Middle School, Shad Bagh, which was nationalised in 1972. He was drawing his old pay scale in 1977, when Revised National Pay Scales were introduced. The appellant opted for Revised National Pay Scales in 1977. 4. The grievance of the appellant is that he has not been treated as an optee for Revised National Pay Scales and his representation etc., has been rejected. Hence this appeal. 5. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the appellant himself and have perused the parawise comments and have also heard the learned District Attorney assisted by representative of the Department. 6. It has been urged on behalf of the appellant that he did opt for the Revised National Pay…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492