| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1957 SLG 8 1957 SLD 8 1957 PLD 17 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 306 of 1956, decided on 6th November 1956 under Article 170 of the Constitution. dates of hearing : 25th, 30th and 31st October 1956
M. R. KAYANI AND MUHAMMAD SHARIF, JJ
Karam Ilahi Chauhan for Petitioner. S. A. Mahmud, Assistant Advocate-General for West Pakistan
Writ Petition No. 306 of 1956, decided on 6th November 1956 under Article 170 of the Constitution. dates of hearing : 25th, 30th and 31st October 1956
M. R. KAYANI AND MUHAMMAD SHARIF, JJ
Karam Ilahi Chauhan for Petitioner. S. A. Mahmud, Assistant Advocate-General for West Pakistan
Raja MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN
VS
THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Law: Evidence Act, (1 of 1872)
Section: 123
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 181(2),182(2)
(a) Evidence Act (1 of 1872)--- ------S. 123-Document containing accusations against public servant which resulted in his discharge-Not "matter of State"-Not privileged. A document containing accusations against a public servant, which, he claims, resulted in his discharge, is not covered by the phrase "matters of State", and is not privileged particularly when the very question to be decided is whether the order of discharge had resulted from an allegation of misconduct. (b) Constitution of Pakistan------ ---, Arts. 181 (2), & 182 (2) proviso-Temporary civil servants, unless their services are terminated in good faith, in accordance with terms of employment, have protection of clause (2) of Art. 181-"Dismissal" "removal", "reduction in rank"-Not conned to cases of misconduct. Clause (2) of Art. 181 of the Constitution of Pakistan contains a condition of an absolute character (i.e. issuing a show cause notice) which must be satisfied before a civil servant can be dismissed or removed from service or reduced in rank. At the same time, proviso to clause (2) of Art. 182, assumes the existence of a temporary service subject to termination on one month's notice or less. The question is whether these provisions can be reconciled. Held, that if the employer's notice to a temporary civil servant is given in good faith, that is to say, in fulfilment of the object which occasioned that particular clause in the contract, such a notice did not entail removal from service. If, however, the notice is not in good faith, and a clause in the contract is being used as a pretext for getting rid of a person who has made himself undesirable for some reason, then the object is to remove him from service, and the case falls under Article 181. That is the only way in which the assumption as to the existence of a temporary service subject to one month's notice, contained in the proviso to Article 182 can be reconciled to Article 181. If it had been intended to exclude from Article 181 (2) temporary services subject to one month's notice, contemplated by Article 182 (2) proviso, a fourth case could very properly have been added to the proviso to Article 181(2). Article 181 is…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492