| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1957 SLG 72 1957 SLD 72 1957 PLD 605 |
Lahore High Court
Second Appeal No. 354 of 1954 decided on 7th May 1957, from the decree of the Court of Ch. Muhammad Din, District Judge, Gujranwala, dated the 31st July 1954, affirming that of Zia Ullah Khan, Senior Civil Judge, Gttjcanwa1a, dated the 14th November 1952
B. Z. KAIKAUS, J
Said Akbar, S. M. Anwar, S. K. Ahmad and Muhammad Iqbal Hussain for Appellant. Iftikhar-ul-Haq for
Respondents
Second Appeal No. 354 of 1954 decided on 7th May 1957, from the decree of the Court of Ch. Muhammad Din, District Judge, Gujranwala, dated the 31st July 1954, affirming that of Zia Ullah Khan, Senior Civil Judge, Gttjcanwa1a, dated the 14th November 1952
B. Z. KAIKAUS, J
Said Akbar, S. M. Anwar, S. K. Ahmad and Muhammad Iqbal Hussain for Appellant. Iftikhar-ul-Haq for
Respondents
(Mst.) IRSHAD BEGUM
VS
SHAH MUHAMMAD and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Custom (Punjab)------ ------Succession-Widow, in presence of son by another wife inherits only rarely. A custom of inheritance by the widow in the presence of son (by another wife) is a rare custom and requires very strong proof. The mere mutation of land in name of widow is scant evidence of such a custom unless it could be shown that the land was not mutated in lieu of maintenance. (b) Custom (Punjab)------ ------Succession-Mother, or stepmother, succeeds to her son as the widow of her husband, but forfeits her inheritance on' re-marriage-Property becomes an accretion to estate of her husband-Correct position of mother's succession indicated. The mother's right of inheritance to her son is only an appendage to the status of a widow. She succeeds really as the widow of her own husband and loses her right on remarriage. Shiromani Parbandhak Committee v. Harcharan Singh A I R 1934 Lah. 1 ; Sundar Singh v. Mst. Jawala Devi A I R 1934 Lah. 205; Ibrahim and others v. Barkat and others 323 P L R 1913 ; Mst. Desi v. Lehna Singh 46 P R 1891 (F B) and Mst. Dhan Kaur v. Arjan Singh A I R 1928 Lah. 983 ref. The word "mother" as used includes a stepmother or a step grandmother. No proof of special custom is required that a another forfeits her right on re-marriage, inasmuch, as she succeeds as the widow of her husband. Mst. Kirpi v. Ramjas 153 P R 1889 ; Kanhaya Singh v. Mst. Premi 322 P L R 1913 Divan v. Hira Nand A I R 1923 Lah. 448 and Bishen Das v. Mst. Mansa Devi 47 P R 1914 considered. Lajwanti and others v. Safa Chand and others I L R 5 Lah. 192 mentioned. Property inherited by a widow as such becomes an accretion to the estate of her husband, the reason being that the widow is a representative of her husband. Lajwanti and others v. Sara Chand and others I L R 5 Lah. 192 ; Akhtar Abbas v. Nazar Abbas A I R 1946 Lah. 10 and Diwan Singh v. Natha Singh A I R 1937 Lah. 468 ref. Whether a female inherits property as the step-grandmother or as a step-mother, she inherits it as the widow of her own husband and the property becomes an accretion to the estate of her husband. Hamira v. Ram Singh 134 P R 1907 distinguished. Correct position of mother's succession…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492