Case Details

Citation(s)
1982 SLG 84 1982 SLD 84 1982 PTD 130
Sindh High Court
Income-tax Reference Application No. 51 of 1972, decisiondated: 25-01-1982. dates of hearing: 24th and 26-11-1981
AJMAL MIAN AND G. M. KAUREJO, JJ
Aziz Ahmed Munshi, Deputy Attorney-General and Haider Ali Pirzada for Applicants. Ali Athar, Naseem Ahmed Khan, Iqbal Naeem Pasha, Muzaffar Hussain, Hyder Raza Naqvi, Mohsin Tayyabali, Naimur Rehman, Shah Hamid Sulaiman and Sirajul Haq for
Respondents

COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax (EAST), KARACHIvsEBRAHIM D. AHMED

Law: Income Tax Act, 1922

Section: 15,15BB,(4AA),(4C)

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 279

(a) Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)---S. 15-BB-Exemption from payment of income-tax-Income of agricultural companies declared in form of dividends-Held, can be equated with income declared in form of dividends by a company covered under S. 15-BB-Factum of exemption from payment of income-tax in respect of two kinds of income establishes-nexus between them. Commissioner of Income-tax, Lahore Zone, Lahore v. Mst. Gulzarina, Multan (1973) 28 Taxation 61 fol. (b) Legislation¬---- ----Curative statutes-Scope of operation-Final cannot be affected by such statute-Judgment until final is, however, subject to power of Legislature to enact curative legislation. (c) Income-tax-- --Assessment-Order of assessment found to be without jurisdiction ¬Held, can be validated during pendency of an appeal or other proceedings arising therefrom by retrospective legislation. (d) Interpretation of statutes- ---Constitutional provision-Two interpretations possible-Interpretation validating such provision-To be preferred. (e) Interpretation of statutes- ----Words "shall" or "hereinafter" used in statute-To be taken to indicate an intent that statute is to be construed prospectively-Use of words "has been" or "heretofore"-Constitutes an explicit declaration that statute has to be construed retrospectively. (f) Interpretation of statutes- ----Law should be interpreted in such a manner that it should rather be saved than destroyed-Legislation not to be struck down unless absolutely necessary. One of the cardinal principles of interpretation is that a law should be interpreted in such a manner that it should, rather be saved than be destroyed and that the Courts should lean in favour of upholding the constitutionality of a legislation and should be reluctant to strike down laws as unconstitu¬tional. unless when absolutely necessary and if not done might well result in grave and serious consequences. (g) Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)-- --- S. 15-BB (4-AA), (4-C) read with Finance Ordinance (XXI of 1972) and Constitution of Pakistan (1972), Art. 279-Exemption from income-tax-Retrospective enactment of subsection (4-AA) of S. 15-BB of Act from date of inception of Act through Ordinance disentitling…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492