Case Details

Citation(s)
1982 SLG 713 1982 SLD 713 1982 PLD 146
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 24-R of 1979, decision dated: 12-12-1979. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 15-11-1979 of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in R. S. A. No. 877 of 1978).
ANWARUL HAQ, C.J. AND MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

ABDUL MAJID AND others

VS

ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN AND OTHERS

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)----S. 11 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-Writ­Res judicata-Contentions raised by appellants in Letters Patent Appeal not upheld by High Court-Plea that by passage of time decree became unexecutable although could be raised by appellants during coup a of hearing of Letters Patent Appeal but they failed to do so ­Appellants, held, cannot raise a new action on basis of such plea and fact of decision given in Letters Patent Appeal having related to a writ matter cannot constitute a valid ground for not applying general principles of res judicata to suit brought by appellants with a view to avoiding effect of decree which stood test of scrutiny by High Court, firstly on civil side and then on writ side.-[Res judicata]. Muhammad Chiragh-ud-Din Bhatti v. The Province of West Pakistan 1971 S C M R 447, Muhammad Shafi and another v. Muhammad Bakhsh and another P L D 1971 Lah. 148 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- -- S. 11-Res judicata-Petitioners filing suit after final decision of High Court in order to remove its effect so as to get their claims sanctioned from Rehabilitation Authorities-Contention that High Court decision would bar fresh inquiry before Rehabilitation Authorities only and not civil suit-Held : Not correct and High Court decision bars reopening of case in every forum whether of special or general jurisdiction, except by way of review or appeal-Provisions of S. 11 C. P. C. even if do not apply in terms to such cases general principles of res judicata would nevertheless be applicable. Commissioner of Income-tax, East Pakistan, Dacca v. Wahiduzzaman P L D 1965 S C 171 and Muhammad Swaleh and another v. Messrs United Grain and Fodder Agencies P L D 1964 S C 97 ref. (c) Special Relief Act (I of 1877)- -- S. 42-Declaratory suit-Contention that as observed in Muhammad Swaleh's case (P L D 1964 S C 97) even decisions of High Court and Supreme Court could be challenged before a Civil Judge 3rd Class, e held, misplaced and remarks in such behalf made in such only of general nature in field of jurisprudence on theoretical side, observing that once nullity brought before Court, Court entitled and…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492