| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1982 SLG 713 1982 SLD 713 1982 PLD 146 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 24-R of 1979, decision dated: 12-12-1979. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 15-11-1979 of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in R. S. A. No. 877 of 1978).
ANWARUL HAQ, C.J. AND MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 24-R of 1979, decision dated: 12-12-1979. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 15-11-1979 of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in R. S. A. No. 877 of 1978).
ANWARUL HAQ, C.J. AND MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ABDUL MAJID AND others
VS
ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN AND OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)----S. 11 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-WritRes judicata-Contentions raised by appellants in Letters Patent Appeal not upheld by High Court-Plea that by passage of time decree became unexecutable although could be raised by appellants during coup a of hearing of Letters Patent Appeal but they failed to do so Appellants, held, cannot raise a new action on basis of such plea and fact of decision given in Letters Patent Appeal having related to a writ matter cannot constitute a valid ground for not applying general principles of res judicata to suit brought by appellants with a view to avoiding effect of decree which stood test of scrutiny by High Court, firstly on civil side and then on writ side.-[Res judicata]. Muhammad Chiragh-ud-Din Bhatti v. The Province of West Pakistan 1971 S C M R 447, Muhammad Shafi and another v. Muhammad Bakhsh and another P L D 1971 Lah. 148 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- -- S. 11-Res judicata-Petitioners filing suit after final decision of High Court in order to remove its effect so as to get their claims sanctioned from Rehabilitation Authorities-Contention that High Court decision would bar fresh inquiry before Rehabilitation Authorities only and not civil suit-Held : Not correct and High Court decision bars reopening of case in every forum whether of special or general jurisdiction, except by way of review or appeal-Provisions of S. 11 C. P. C. even if do not apply in terms to such cases general principles of res judicata would nevertheless be applicable. Commissioner of Income-tax, East Pakistan, Dacca v. Wahiduzzaman P L D 1965 S C 171 and Muhammad Swaleh and another v. Messrs United Grain and Fodder Agencies P L D 1964 S C 97 ref. (c) Special Relief Act (I of 1877)- -- S. 42-Declaratory suit-Contention that as observed in Muhammad Swaleh's case (P L D 1964 S C 97) even decisions of High Court and Supreme Court could be challenged before a Civil Judge 3rd Class, e held, misplaced and remarks in such behalf made in such only of general nature in field of jurisprudence on theoretical side, observing that once nullity brought before Court, Court entitled and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492