Case Details

Citation(s)
1982 SLG 707 1982 SLD 707 1982 PLD 49
Lahore High Court
Revision Petition No. 896 of 1972, decided on 22nd December, 1972
AFTAB HUSSAIN, J ..
Ch. Abid Ali Butter for Petitioner. Kh. Muhammad Tufail for
Respondents

JAMIL ANMAD---Appellant

VS

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND 4 others--Respondents

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- -- O. XXXIX, rr. 1 & 2 read with . Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 56 - Injunctions, temporary and perpetual - Provisions of O. XXXIX, rr. 1 & 2. apart from danger or threat to property, or likelihood of commission of breach of contract, or any other injury, having not laid down any other ground as may tie considered essential for determining whether temporary injunction be allowed or refused, considerations applying to issue of permanent injunctions as laid down in S. 56 of Specific Relief Act, 1877, held, relevant for issuance of temporary injunctions as well-Temporary injunctions, held further, ordinarily not to be granted where permanent injunctions barred but where permanent injunctions could be granted temporary injunction could not be refused. M., K. Oanday v. D. P. Fouji & Co. Ltd. P L D 1951 Lab. 263 ; Malik Sohara Khan and others v. Ahmad Khan and others 7 P R 1899; Hamashwar Das v. Jai Narain A 1 R 1920 Lab. 436 ; Chet Ram v. Hari Bakhsh A I R 192'6 Lab. 435 ; Kunj Behari Lal v, Mst. Mubarak Begum A I R 1927 Lab. 833(2) ; N. W. Ry. Administration v. M. S. Ry. Union A 1 R 1933 Lab. 203 ; Brajendra Nath v. Kashi Bai A I R 1946 Pat. 177 and Begg Dunion & Co. v. Satish Chandra Chatterjee I L R 46 Cal. 1001 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- O. XXXIX, rr. 1 & 2 read with Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 54 & 56-Injunctions--Balance of convenience-Question of balance of convenience and irreparable loss or injury---To be ordinarily considered together as conditions supplementing each other just as Ss. 54 &.56 supplement each other-While considering question of balance of convenience, one has really to consider whether inconvenience in event of withholding relief of temporary injunction in all events exceeds that of defendant in case of his being restrained. Noor Hussain v. Muhammad Sultan P L D 1956 Lab. 893 ref. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- O. XXXIX, rr. 1 & 2 read with Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 54 & 56-Injunction, temporary-Balance of convenience-Proper course for Court in matter of interlocutory orders where breach of right of plaintiff…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492