| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1982 SLG 538 1982 SLD 538 1982 SCMR 938 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 32 of 1975, decision dated: 16th Mare, 1980.(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 13-11-1974 in C. R. No. 120 of 1974 (BWP)
DORAB PATEL AND NASIM HASAN SHAH, JJ
Ch. Muhammad Said, Advocate and Rana M. A. Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondent.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 32 of 1975, decision dated: 16th Mare, 1980.(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 13-11-1974 in C. R. No. 120 of 1974 (BWP)
DORAB PATEL AND NASIM HASAN SHAH, JJ
Ch. Muhammad Said, Advocate and Rana M. A. Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondent.
SULEMAN AND others
VS
BAGH ALI
Law:
Section:
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---S.115-Revision-Dispute in revision turning out solely on appreciation, of evidence-Held, revision rightly dismissed by High Court in limine.-[Evidence]. ORDER DORAB PATEL, J.-The first seven petitioners are the heirs of one Karim Bakhsh, who, according to the respondent, bad sold him the land in dispute. But the eighth petitioner claimed that the same land and other land had been sold to him by Karim Bakhsh, therefore, the respondent filed a suit for a declaration that he was the owner of the land in dispute by virtue of a registered sale-deed executed by Karim Bakhsh. The suit was contested by Karim Bakhsh and the eighth petitioner, and both parties produced evidence in support of their respective claims. Further, the respondent did not produce the sale-deed on which he relied, but produced oral evidence which according to the trial Court was sufficient to prove that Karim Bakhsh (now deceased) had registered the sale in the respondent's favour for the land in dispute. Therefore, the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492