Case Details

Citation(s)
1982 SLG 157 1982 SLD 157 1982 SCMR 106
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for -Special Leave to Appeal No. K-2.06 of 1979, decision dated: 15-08-1979. (On appeal from the Judgment dated 14-5-1979 passed in Constitutional Petition No. D-642,179 by the High Court of Sind at Karachi)
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN AND SHAFIUR REHMAN, JJ
Talmiz S. Burney, Advocate instructed by Vakil Ahmed Aidwai, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents.

Miss KHURSHEED BANO

VS

CHAIRMAN & MEMBER, SELECTION COMMITTEE, LIAQUAT MEDICAL COLLEGE, HYDIRABAD AND 2 OTHERS-

Law:

Section:

(a) Prospectus of Liaquat Medical College Hyderabad---- R. 7 - Domicile certificate - Rule 7 lists domicile certificate separately and, independently of permanent residence certificate-­Contention that permanent residence certificate having been filed, domicile certificate no longer required and such requirement a mere redundancy, held, not correct [Educational institutions]. (b) Prospectus of Liaquat Medical College, Hyderabad- -- R. 32--Selection-Rule 32 controls authorities making selection and requires all admissions to be completed within two months of date of completion of interviews and no admission to be allowed after expiry of such period-Rule, held, confers no right on any party for claiming a period of two months following for completing papers.­[Educational institutions]. (c) Prospectus of Liaquat Medical College, Hyderabad - --R. 12-Disqualification-Rule 12 providing for non-consideration of any document received after date of interview-Deficiency in completing documents before date of interview, held, had to be visited by disqualification of candidate:-[Educational institutions]. (d) Prospectus of Liaquat Medical College, Hyderabad- ---R. 12-Disqualification-Effect of r. 12-Committee interviewing candidate considering petitioner's case to be one of bona fide mistake and allowing her two days' time to file domicile certificate-Two d s' time allowed not for applying but for obtaining and filing domicile certificate-Failure being of authorities and not of candidate, rule in such case allows candidate to apply for selection in next year's course provided documents issued late by Government ­Subject to satisfaction of other requirements of candidate, petitioner' request for admission, held, to be carried over to next year.-' [Educational institutions]. ORDER SHAFI-UR-REHMAN, J-The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against a judgment whereby her Constitutional Petition challenging the refusal of the authorities to admit her in the medical college, was dismissed. 2. The petitioner claims to be an orphan. Out of the ten candidates to be selected from that District she was seventh on the merit list. She was called for interview on 26-2-1979 but her…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492