| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1982 SLG 1423 1982 SLD 1423 1982 PLC 106 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Application No. HYD-289 of 1981, heard on 19thSeptember, 1981.
Z. A. CHANNA, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Application No. HYD-289 of 1981, heard on 19thSeptember, 1981.
Z. A. CHANNA, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
SHAUKAT ALI
VS
CHIEF ENGINEER, G. S. C. (SOUTH), POWER, WAPDA, HYDERABAD
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---- --- S. 25-A (9) (b)-Complaint regarding violation of order of Court-Labour Appellate Tribunal setting aside order of employer regarding reversion of petitioner workman with option to review or modify earlier promotion order after opportunity of hearing to petitioner-Petitioner re-instated and served with show-cause notice to explain why promotion order being not regular be with drawn-Satisfactory cause not shown by petitioner hence reverted by competent authority and claim for arrears of pay on higher post recommended to higher competent authority-Petitioner moving complaint before Appellate Tribunal allegedly complaining violation of order of Tribunal-Petitioner, in circumstances, held, had failed to make out any case for action against employer because he had been re-instated and reverted after show-cause notice. Applicant in person. Imam Ali Memon for Respondent. Date of hearing: 19thSeptember, 1981. ORDER By the order, made on 6thNovember, 1980, this Tribunal had set aside the order of reversion of the applicant from N.P.S. 14 to N.P.S. 11 but at the same time had given an option to the competent authority to review or modify the order of promotion of the applicant after giving him an opportunity of being heard. 2. The applicant claims that the above orders of this Tribunal have been violated inasmuch as he has not been granted or continued in the grade on N. P. S. 14 but as has been reverted to N. P. S. 11. The applicant had filed a complaint against the respondent before the learned Labour Court but the same dismissed on the ground that the Labour Court had no jurisdiction in the matter -as the order violated was of this Tribunal and the case fell to be decided under the provisions of clause (b) of subsection (9) of section 25-A,1. R. O. The applicant has accordingly approached this Tribunal for taking action against the respondent for violating its orders. 3. I have heard the applicant who appeared in person and Mr. Imam Ali Memon, who appeared for the respondent Chief Engineer. Mr. Imam Ali submitted that the orders of this Tribunal have been duly complied with inasmuch as the original order of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492