Case Details

Citation(s)
1956 SLG 98 1956 SLD 98 1956 PLD 479
Lahore High Court
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 531 of 1955 decided on 23rd November 1955 under section 223-A, Government of India Act, 1935
J. ORTCHESON AND MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, JJ
Iftikhar-ul-Haq Khan and Khadim Mohi-ud-Din for Petitioner. Abdur Rahman, R. O. Legal for
Respondent. Mahboob Jilani for Punjab Transport Service

Ch. KHADIM MOHYUDDIN

VS

THE DEPUTY REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LAYALLPur

Law: Pakistan Rehabilitation Ordinance (XIX of 1948)

Section: 8(2)(b)

Law: Government of India Act, 1935

Section: 223A

(a) Pakistan Rehabilitation Ordinance (XIX of 1948), S. 8 (2) (b)-Property required for public purpose-No ground f or ejectment or cancellation of allotment-Rehabilitation Authority restrained by writ of mandamus-Government of India Act, 1935, S. 223-A. Held, that allottee of premises does not become an unsuitable person within meaning of section 8 (2) (b), Pakistan Rehabilitation Ordinance (XIX of 1948) just because the premises in question are required for a public purpose. The unsuitability of an allottee must be determined with reference to his personal qualities and not with reference to the object for which the property allotted to him is required by the Rehabilitation Department. Further, that a Rehabilitation Authority is not em­powered to cancel an allotment on that ground in the absence of a notification by the Rehabilitation Commissioner in regard to it issued by virtue of powers delegated to him by the Custodian under section 14 (4), Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Ordinance (XV of 1949). Therefore, the condition of allotment, vii., that the D. R. C. may cancel any allotment, if premises are required for a public purpose, embodied in Form of Allotment, given in Appendix V of the Manual of Instructions was ultra vices. The Rehabilitation Authority therefore could neither eject the allottee on the ground that premises were required for a public purpose, nor could an allotment be cancelled on this ground. The Authority was restrained by a writ of mandamus under section 223-A, Government of India Act, 1935. (b) Necessary parties-Order of ejectment issued by Deputy Rehabilitation Commissioner under instructions of Central and Provincial Governments-Contested by writ petition Central or Provincial Government not necessary party. The mere fact that the Deputy Rehabilitation Commis­sioner passed orders for ejectment of the petitioner at the instance of the Provincial or the Central Government, does not render it incumbent upon the petitioner to implead the said Governments as parties to the petition. (c) Government of India Act, 1935, S. 223-A-Jurisdiction to issue writs not conned to cases of judicial orders, or to cases where other remedy…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492