| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1981 SLG 2335 1981 SLD 2335 1981 PLC 634 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeals Nos. KAR-969 to 972 of ,1980, heard on 15th January, 1981.
Z. A. CHANNA, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeals Nos. KAR-969 to 972 of ,1980, heard on 15th January, 1981.
Z. A. CHANNA, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD FIAZ AND 3 OTHERS
VS
Messrs FARHAN SILK -INDUSTRIES, KARACHI
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance,(XXIII of 1969)- --- S. 25-A-Re-instatement prayed on plea that dismissal was oral and wrongful-Evidence and record indicating that cases were of voluntary resignation or valid termination of temporary workers--Full dues with final settlement also , having been received-Interference, in circumstances, held, rightly refused by Labour Court. Ali Ahmad for Appellants. Date of haring: 15th January, 1981. ORDER The 4 appellants, who were employed in the respondent establishment, filed separate grievance petitions before the learned IIIrd Labour Court, alleging that they bad been wrongfully dismissed from service by the respondent establishment, by oral orders, and accordingly prayed for reinstatement in service with full back benefits. The learned Labour Court has dismissed their grievance petitions by a common decision holding that appellant Muhammad Faiyaz and Muhammad Riaz had voluntarily tendered their resignations ,which had been duly accepted by the respondent establishment, while respondents, Nazar Muhammad and Shamim Ahmad, who were temporary workmen, had collected their dues from the respondent-establishment in full and final settlement and hence had ceased to be aggrieved workmen. The findings of the learned Labour Court are based upon the documentary evidence plus the oral testimony of the respondent establishment's witness, Noor Islam, tendered before it. 2. Now, as regards the cases of appellants Muhammad Faiyaz and Muhammad Riaz, the learned Labour Court relied, firstly, upon the written resignations, said to have been given by them to the respondent Management, which were accepted on 7th April, 1980 and 8th June, 1980 respectively. The learned Labour Court compared the signatures on these 2 documents with the respective signatures of the appellants, Muhammad Faiyaz and Muhammad Riaz, taken in Court and also appearing on the documents admittedly bearing their signatures and came to the conclusion that they tallied. I have myself compared the signature on the 2 resignation applications with the respective signatures of the 2 appellants on the 2 admitted documents and would concur in the view taken by the learned…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492