Case Details

Citation(s)
1981 SLG 2208 1981 SLD 2208 1981 PLC 351
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. 817/736 of 1974, decided on 11th November, 1979.
M. SALEEM CHAUDHRY, CHAIRMAN AND TWO MEMBERS

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD SALEEM

VS

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Law:

Section:

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)--- ---S. 4-Retirement under Removal from Service (Special Provisions) Regulation [M. L. R. 114 of 1972]-Appeal against-No indication that record was duly considered by competent authority-Record containing adverse remarks by reporting authority washed by coun­tersigning authority as "biased"--Definite indication of consistent improvement visible from A. C. Rs.-Case, held, not meriting premature retirement on 11 years of service-Appeal accepted. ORDER M. SALEEM CHAUDHRY (CHAIRMAN).-Mohammad Saleem joined the West Pakistan Forest Class I Service on 9-10-1961. He was retired on 18-3-1972 prematurely under Martial Law Regulation No. 114. 2. We have heard both the parties and seen the Annual Confidential Reports of Mr. Muhammad Saleem. 3. The appellant's Annual Confidential Reports for the years 1962, 1964, 1965, 1969, 1970 and 1971 are adverse, The remarks for the year 1962 are by the Joint Secretary, that "his work was not up to the mark", while the Chief Conservator of Forests gave him "a good report". For the year 1964, the Conservator of Forests, Sukkur gave him an adverse remarks which the Chief Conservator of Forests considered to be biased. However, the Chief Conservator of Forests thought the officer "to be lazy and below average officer". For the year 1965 the Conservator of Forests, again gave him an adverse report which again the Chief Conservator of Forests thought "to be very biased", while maintaining his view that the officer was average who should become useful after extensive training and experience". These two reports of the Conservator Forests are not to be considered in view of the remarks of the countersigning officer that they were biased. For the second half of 1965, the Chief Conservator of Forests reported that "he needs consistent guidance and left the charge of Shikarpur Division in a mess". However in the year 1966, the same reporting officer felt consider­able improvements and usefulness in the appellant. Again in 1967, he found the appellant as energetic officer who was fast-learning organization, execution and control of field work though needed training experience but had shown considerable…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492