| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1981 SLG 2041 1981 SLD 2041 1981 PLC 97 |
Sindh High Court
Petition No. 104 of 1975, decided on 12th November 1980.
SALEEM AKHTAR, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Petition No. 104 of 1975, decided on 12th November 1980.
SALEEM AKHTAR, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MESSERS JUPITER GENERAL INDUSTRIES
VS
SIND LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND 2 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)---- -----Art. 199-Discretionary relief-Concealment of material facts- Disentitles a petitioner from seeking discretionary relief. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---- ----S. 32 (1-A)-Industrial dispute-----Application to Labour Court Words "after the commencement of strike or lock-out"-Indicate that' once strike or lock-out has commenced the party is entitled to make an application-Statute has fixed only starting point and has not fixed time when the party be debarred from making such application-No terminus quo fixed but party entitled to apply shall not have unlimited period at its disposal-Application must be filed within reasonable period after termination of strike-Negligence and laches may disentitle the party from seeking such remedy-Strike prohibited by Labour Court under S. 45 of industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969-Does not amount to termination but would only be a suspension without prejudicially affecting rights of parties-Contention that application to Labour Court after issuance of prohibition order by Labour Court was not maintainable rejected Application of Trade Union under S. 32 (1-A) to Labour Court after its strike was prohibited by Labour' Court under S. 45 of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, held, maintainable. Employees' Union v. Monnoo Motors and others P L D 1975 Kar. 811 distinguished. Abdul Majid Khan v. The Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner Pakistan, Lahore P L D 1968 S C 154 and Khawaja Ghulam Sar war v. Pakistan P L D 1962 S C 142 rel. Hassan A. Shaikh for Appellant. Ali Amjad for Respondent. Dates of hearing : 28th and 29th October 1980. JUDGMENT SALEEM AKHTAR, J.-The petitioners have challenged the order of the learned Sind Labour Appellate Tribunal, whereby he has held that the respondent No. 3 the Union were competent to raise the industrial dispute and further that the application filed by the Union under section 32(1-A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance) was maintainable. The petitioners are manufacturers of Hoseiry Products of Cotton and the respondent No. 3 claim to be a General Union of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492