| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1981 SLG 1862 1981 SLD 1862 (1981) 131 ITR 451 |
Supreme Court of India
29826
P.N. BHAGWATI AND E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, JJ.
A. Subba Rao for the Appellant. A. Subhashini for the
Respondent
29826
P.N. BHAGWATI AND E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, JJ.
A. Subba Rao for the Appellant. A. Subhashini for the
Respondent
Kapurchand Shrimalv.Commissioner of IncomE tax
Law:
Section:
Section 25A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 [Corresponding to section 171 of the income-tax act, 1961] - Hindu undivided family - Assessment after partition - Assessment order passed by ITO in case of a HUF without holding an inquiry into validity of claim of partition made within a reasonable time by a member of HUF - Whether such assessment liable to be cancelled - Held, yes - Whether tribunal dealing with such question in appeal can merely cancel ITO's order without a further direction to assessing authority either to modify assessment suitably or to pass a fresh order of assessment in accordance with law-Held, no Facts An assessment order for the assessment year 1955-56, being made on the assessee-HUF on 30-5-1959, was set aside by the AAC on 24-2-1962 with a direction to make fresh assessment. When fresh assessment proceedings were commenced pursuant to the aforesaid direction, the assessment proceedings for the assessment years 1957-58 and 1958-59 were also taken up. Earlier by a number of letters, the assessee's karta had requested the ITO for an order under section 25A of the 1922 Act [corresponding to section 171 of the 1961 Act]. The assessments for the assessment years 1955-56 to 1958-59 were, however, completed between 31-8-1962 and 27-3-1963 without holding an inquiry as contemplated by section 25A regarding the factum of partition. The ITO, thereafter, started an inquiry under section 25A and by his order dated 30-3-1965 refused to record the partition. On appeal, the AAC set aside the ITO's order and directed the ITO to record the partition under section 25A as on 10-7-1960. That order became final as no appeal was filed against it by the department. However, for the assessment years 1959-60, 1960-61 and 1961-62, the ITO had passed the assessment orders before the AAC held that the partition had taken place on 10-7-1960. In the appeals filed before the AAC against the assessment orders for the assessment years 1955-56 to 1961-62, it was contended by the assessee that the assessments were liable to be set aside on the ground that the inquiry into the claim of partition which was a condition precedent for making an order of assessment on the HUF…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492