| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1981 SLG 1276 1981 SLD 1276 1981 PLD 21 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos. 133 and 134 of 1978, heard on 25thFebruary 1980. (On appeal from the judgments and ordersdated 21-2-1977 of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in F. A.O. No. 74/1974 and F. A. O. No. 71/1974)
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH AND SHAFI-UR-REHMAN, JJ
Civil Appeals Nos. 133 and 134 of 1978, heard on 25thFebruary 1980. (On appeal from the judgments and ordersdated 21-2-1977 of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in F. A.O. No. 74/1974 and F. A. O. No. 71/1974)
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH AND SHAFI-UR-REHMAN, JJ
Civil Appeal No. 133 of 1978MESSRS REHMAN WEAVING FACTORY (REGD.), BAHAWALNAGARvsINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTANANDCivil Appeal No. 134 of 1978MESSRS REHMAN WEAVING FACTROY (REGD.), BAHAWALNAGARvsPUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
Law:
Section:
(a) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)----Arts. 164 & 169 read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. IX, rr. 6 & 13-Words and phrases-Words "summons" and "notice"-Word "summons" used in Art. 164-Not used by Legislature in a general sense so as to mean every form of judicial process including a notice-Word "summons" in Art. 164-Used in contradistinction from notice and other forms of processes with a definite intention and purpose, such purpose being to corelate Art. 164 with phraseology used in O. IX, r. 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, having a bearing on, and connection with, main provision permitting ex parte decree on very first hearing of suit viz. O. IX, r. 6.-[Words and phrases]. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)----O. IX, rr. 6 & 13 & O. XVII, r. 2-Words "Sufficient cause " Causes to be treated as sufficient.-[Words and phrases]. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-- O. IX, rr. 6 & 13 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts. 164 & 181-Ex parte decree, setting aside of-Limitation-Any cause shown for non-appearance at first hearing, whether non service of summons, or any other sufficient cause, e.g., accident or act of God-Art. 164 applies to such case and Limitation commences from date of knowledge of decree (when summons not duly served) otherwise from date of decree-Application for setting aside ex parse decree not covered by Art. 164-Governed by residuary Art. 181 giving period of limitation as three years from accrual of right to apply Ex parte decree passed on a date after initial service of summons, on fresh hearing after return of records from High Court, and defendants having no notice of date of bearing when such decree passed Applications for setting aside ex parte decree made within three years of ex parte decree as also from date of knowledge of decree, held, within prescribed limitation period. Manager, Jammu & Kashmir, State Property in Pakistan v. Khuda Yar and another P L D 1975 S C 678 ; Muhammad Swaleh and another v. Messrs United Grain & Fodder Agencies P L D 1964 S C 97 ; Mian Kamal Din v Malik. Muhammad Bashir and others P L D 1952 Lab. 456 ; Netai Sikari and others v. Sashi Bhusan Biswas and others P L D 1962 Dacca 60 ;…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492