Case Details

Citation(s)
1980 SLG 601 1980 SLD 601 1980 PLD 176
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 1310 of 1972, decided on 20th October, 1972
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J
Sh. Ziaullah, for Appellants. Ch. Muhammad Farooq for
Respondent

SHAHID DAVID MALIK

VS

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AND another--Respondents

Law:

Section:

(a) Natural justice. principles of- Evidence Act (I of 1972), S. 138-Cross-examination, right of Petitioner candidate denying charge totally and raising a counter version but Discipline Committee not hearing Superintendent in support of his short report containing charge against petitioner candidate nor asking from him any question either in presence or behind back of petitioner in respect of plea raised by petitioner-Such course. if taken in presence of petitioner, petitioner .might have suggested some questions to committee or might have been allowed to cross-examine Superintendent and result might have been different-Right of cross-examination in such inquiries though not immutable yet depending upon circumstances of case same, held, could not be disallowed-Order of . Discipline Committee in circumstances declared to be suffering from an infirmity.-[Cross-examination-Educational institutions]. Writ Petition No. 1782 of 1967 -and -Habibur Rehman v. Siddique Ahmad Khan P L D 1972 Lah. 8 ref. (b) Natural justice, principles of---- Maxim : Audi alteram partem (no one should be condemned unheard)-Appeal-Right to. be heard in appeal-Held, a , part of rule of natural justice contained in maxim : Audi alteram partem.[Appeal (civil)]. Federation of Pakistan v. Sardar -Ali P L D' 1959 S C (Pak.) 25; Chief Commissioner, Karachi v. Dina Sohrab Katrak P L D 1959 S C (Pak.) 45 ; Province of East Pakistan v. Nur Ahmad P L D 1964 S C 451 and Nur Ahmad v. Collectot and Deputy Commissioner P L D 1964 S C 461 .ref. (c) Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (Lahore) Calendar- -Chap. 6, r. 17(iv)-Appeal-Right to be heard--Expression "if he so desires" in r. 17(iv)-pule 17 itself presupposing grant of right of hearing, expression "if he so desires, held further, affords an opportunity of appearance before Appellate Authority and cannot by itself be interpreted to have taken away right of opportunity of appearance at time of hearing of appeal.-[Appeal (civil)]. Zafar-ul-Ashan v. Republic of Pakistan P L D ]959 Lah. 879 ; Mumtaz Hussain v. University of Sind P L D 1966 Kar. 429 ; Ijlas Ahmad Siddiqi .v. Municipal Committee P L D 1967 Lah. 408 ; Abdul Latif Niaz v.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492