Case Details

Citation(s)
1980 SLG 27 1980 SLD 27 1980 PTD 57 (1980) 42 TAX 106
Lahore High Court
P. T. R. No. 24 and T. R. No. 41 of 1973, heard on 9-07-1979. dates of hearing: 10-06-1978 and 9-07-1979
MUHAMMAD AFZAL LONE AND MUHAMMAD AMIN BUTT, JJ
Javed Hashmi for Petitioner. Sh. Abdul Hag for
Respondent

MESSRS AHMAD & AHMAD, MULTAN

VS

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE ZONE, LAHORE

Law: Income Tax Act, 1922

Section: 4,66,42

(a) Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)---S. 4 read with S. 66-Assessment-Finding of fact--High Court, jurisdiction of-Main basis for rejection of accounts by Income-tax Officer: unverifiability of cash sales and lower G. P. rate-No evidence produced by assessee to controvert verifiability of retail sales-Finding of Income-tax Officer-Not dislodged in appeal before Tribunal-Such finding of fact, held, could not be interfered with by High Court on reference under S. 66. P. B. Jassaram Fateh Chand v. Commissioner of -Income-tax (1974) 29 Taxation 161 and S. M. Yousuf & Brothers v. Commissioner of Income-tax 1974 P T D 45 distinguished. (b) Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)-. ---S. 4 read with S. 66-Presumption-Petitioner-assessee never relying on a specified enactment in appellate proceedings to substantiate names and addresses of retailers being available from firm's record-Copy of grounds of appeal also not filed to show such point having been taken before Tribunal-Inference, however, tee be drawn of such specific point having not been urged by assessee before Tribunal-Point, held, could not be raised before High Court. Bachu Bai F. E. Dinshaw v. Commissioner of Income-tax P L D 1967 Kar. 372 and Raja Bahadar Sir Rajindra Narayan Bhanj Deo v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar and Orissa A I R 1940 P C 158 ref. (c) Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)- S. 66-Investigation of facts-High Court, jurisdiction of-Investiga­tion of facts-Held, beyond scope of proceedings under S. 66. (d) Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)- --- S. 42 read with S. 66-Assessment-Jurisdiction-Unverifiability of cash sales coupled with gross profit rate, cumulatively constituting material for rejection of accounts-Correctness or otherwise of conclu­sions reached by Tribunal-Not to be adjudged by weighing each fact detached by-Cumulative effect of all facts to be measured together as intrinsic components of same portrait Rejection of accounts not interfered with. Edwards (Inspector of Taxes) v. Bairstow (1955) 28I T R 579 ref. (e) Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)- S. 66-Reference-High Court, jurisdiction of-Question of suffi­ciency or insufficiency of evidence or quality of evidence-Not to be looked into by High Court.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492