Case Details

Citation(s)
1980 SLG 190 1980 SLD 190 1980 SCMR 152
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K 217 of 1976, decision dated: 25-01-1977. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Sind & Baluchistan, Karachi dated the 13-05-1976 in Constitution Petition, No. 1008 of 1974).
ANWARUL HAQ AND MUHAMMAD HALEEM, JJ
A. A. Shareef, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ismail Tejani, Advocate on-Record. Nemo.

GLAXO LABORATORIES (PAKISTAN) LTD.

VS

SIND LABOUR COURT No. 2, KARACHI AND ANOTHER

Law:

Section:

(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ----- Art. 185 (3) read with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S. Os. 12 (2) & 15 Probationer Termination of service Whether case one of termination of service simpliciter or one of dismissal or removal for unsatisfactory work Submission involving a question of law of some public importance affecting nature of employment of a large number of persons Leave to appeal granted. [Question of law]. West Pakistan Road Transport Workers' Union (Regd.), Rawalpindi v. The Road Transport Corporation, Lahore 1970 P L C 332; The Glaxo Laboratories (Pak.) Ltd. v. Pakistan P L D 1962 S C 60 , Muhammad Naseem Ahmed v. Azra Feroza Bakht P L D 1968 S C 37; Muhammad Siddiq v. Choudhary v. West Pakistan Government P L D 1975 S C 1 and Muhammad Afzal Khan v. Superintendent of Police, Distt. Montgomery P L D 1961 Lah. 806 ref. ORDER MUHAMMAD HALEEM, J. The petitioner seeks special leave to appeal from the judgment dated 13th May, 1976 of a learned Single Judge of the erstwhile High Court of Sind and Baluchistan Karachi by which Petition No, 1008 of 1974 was dismissed. Respondent No. 2 was appointed in the service of the petitioner as a Junior Operator in the E. D. P. Department on three months probation by letter dated 27th June, 1973 and it was a condition of his appointment that he should satisfactorily complete his probationary period. His performance during this period was not upto the technical standard and he was, therefore, informed to improve his standard otherwise his services would be terminated in accordance with the Standing Order No. 12 (2) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 read with the letter dated 27th June, 1973. The respondent No. 2 requested by letter dated 14th September, 1973 that he should be given a chance to improve his work and he was accordingly given two months time to show improvement in his work. However, respondent No. 2 did not come upto the mark even during the extended period and his services were terminated by letter dated 1st November, 1973. In all he had served for five months during which…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492