Law:

Section:

Supreme Court Rules, 1956 ----O. XXVI, r. 3 Review Review petition presented without signature of Senior Counsel being incompetent, its resubmission in Registry of Court barred by 16 days Explanation for delay counsel being not aware of requirement of rule Explanation, held, not satisfactory Petition dismissed Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 188. [Review] ORDER G. SAFDAR SHAH, J. This petition filed by Muhammad Aslam Khan seeks the review of the judgment of this Court, dated 9th April, 1978. But according to the report of the Office it is barred by 16 days. The record would show that this petition was filed in the Registry of this Court on 31st May, 1978 but it was returned to the learned A. O. R. for want of signatures of the Senior Advocate, as required by rule 3 of Order XXVI of the Rules of this Court. After complying with the said objection, the petition was re filed in the Registry on 17th June, 1978 but on that date it had already become barred by 16 days. In order to seek the condonation of the delay in question, in para. 3 of the application filed in that behalf it has been alleged that "at the time of the filing of the Review Petition the petitioner…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492