| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1980 SLG 1659 1980 SLD 1659 1980 CLC 629 |
Sindh High Court
Regular Second Appeal No. 477 of 1967 Second Appeal No. 108 of 1966
DORAB PATEL, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Regular Second Appeal No. 477 of 1967 Second Appeal No. 108 of 1966
DORAB PATEL, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
N. M. Najmi
VS
Jooma And 6 Other
Law:
Section:
Keywords: Evidence, Trial Court, Adjustment, Orders, Defaulter, Division, Dispute, Non-Compliance, Extension, Plea, Case Remanded, Eviction Application, Default In Compliance, Time-Barred, Defence, Extension Of Time, Tentative Rent, Procedure, Settlement Authorities, Compliance, Recovery, Rent Controller, Costs, Order, Payment, Question Of Law, Landlord, Petition, Payment Of Rent, Refund, Set Aside, Property, Parties, Rent, Illegal, Certificate, Permission, Copy Result: Case remanded JUDGMENT This is a Second appeal under the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (hereinafter called the said Ordinance) against the concurrent orders of a Rent Controller and District Judge, Karachi striking off the appellant's defence for non-compliance with the Rent Controller's orders for deposit under subsection (6) of section 13 of the said Ordinance. The respondents are the owners of the property demised to, the appellant and had filed .An eviction application against him sometime' in 1964. As the appellant contested the eviction ,application, in due course, the Rent Controller passed an order for deposit of tentative rent under subsection (6). He fixed the monthly rent at 36 and directed the appellant to pay Rs. 1.800 as arrears and to deposit the monthly rent at Rs. 36 p.m. The appellant complied with this order but according to the respondents, lie was irregular in the deposit of rent, therefore they filed an application that an enquiry should be made as to whether he had complied with the order of deposit of rent and that if it was found that he had committed breach of the order his defence should be struck oft: The appellant contested this application and the case of the respondents appears to have been that the appellant had committed default twice. Thus it was argued that he had deposited the rent of Decem ber, 1964 on 5th January, 1965 and she rent of March 1965 on 7th April 1965. As the 4th January, 1965 was a holiday, the-Rent Controller rejected the plea that the appellant had committed default in the deposit of the rent of Decem ber, 1964 but the rent of March, 1965 had been deposited on 7th April, 1'765, and the appellant's only plea in justification…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492