Case Details

Citation(s)
1979 SLG 252 1979 SLD 252 1979 PLD 18
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 136 of 1978, decision dated: 18-09-1978. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 25-2-1978 of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 1124-C/78 and 1126-C/78)
WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD, MUHAMMAD AKRAM AND NASIM,HASAN SHAH, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Mst. AFZAL BEGUM AND others

VS

Y. M. C. A. THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908-- O. VIII, r. 11 [as amended by Lahore High Court] & O. VIII, r. 12 read with O. VII, r. 24 [as amended by Lahore High Court] -Change of address-Party desiring change in address for service as already filed by him-To file verified petition-Court may direct amendment of record accordingly with notice to other party - Petitioners, respondents in appeal before District Judge, allowing their old address to stand on record and not intimating their changed address to Court ­Adverse party in circumstances, held, acted in perfect good faith in filing appeal against them at their old given address. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- O. V, r. 20(2), O. IX, r. 13 and O. XLI, r. 21-Substituted service--Service of process substituted by order of Court-As effectual as though made on defendant personally--Ex parte decree passed after service of process by way of substituted service-Defendant, held, not precluded from afterwards showing order of substituted service having been improperly secured and his being not duly served.-[Substituted service]. Ram Bharose v. Ganga Singh A I R 1931 All. 727 ref. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- O. V, r. 20, O. IX, r. 13 & O. XLI, r. 21 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts. 164 & 169-Ex parte decree, setting aside of ­Limitation-Substituted service under O. V, r. 20-Does not amount to "due service"-Due service effected of summons in suit or of notice in appeal-Period of limitation for application to set aside ex parte decree or for rehearing of appeal heard ex parte-To be computed from date of decree-Summons in suit or notice in appeal not "duly served"-Limitation commences from date of knowledge of decree.­[Limitation-Ex parte decree]. Dittu Ram v. Nawab A I R 1925 Lah. 634; Hans Raj v. Narain Singh and another A I R 1931 Lah. 118 ; K B. Narasimha Chettiar v. K. P. Balakrishna Chettiar A I R 1927 Mad. 487 ; Vitta Venkatachalam and another v. Si vapurm Subbaya A I R 1928 Mad. 655 ; Shariba Beeby v. Abdul Salam and another A I R 1928 Mad. 815 ; M. R. A. L. Lakshmanan Chetty v. M. R. A. P. L. Palantappa Chetty A I R 1928 Mad. 1052 ; Gynammal v. Abdul Hussain Sahib A I R 1931 Mad.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492