| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1979 SLG 252 1979 SLD 252 1979 PLD 18 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 136 of 1978, decision dated: 18-09-1978. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 25-2-1978 of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 1124-C/78 and 1126-C/78)
WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD, MUHAMMAD AKRAM AND NASIM,HASAN SHAH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition No. 136 of 1978, decision dated: 18-09-1978. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 25-2-1978 of the Lahore High Court at Lahore in Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 1124-C/78 and 1126-C/78)
WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD, MUHAMMAD AKRAM AND NASIM,HASAN SHAH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Mst. AFZAL BEGUM AND others
VS
Y. M. C. A. THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908-- O. VIII, r. 11 [as amended by Lahore High Court] & O. VIII, r. 12 read with O. VII, r. 24 [as amended by Lahore High Court] -Change of address-Party desiring change in address for service as already filed by him-To file verified petition-Court may direct amendment of record accordingly with notice to other party - Petitioners, respondents in appeal before District Judge, allowing their old address to stand on record and not intimating their changed address to Court Adverse party in circumstances, held, acted in perfect good faith in filing appeal against them at their old given address. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- O. V, r. 20(2), O. IX, r. 13 and O. XLI, r. 21-Substituted service--Service of process substituted by order of Court-As effectual as though made on defendant personally--Ex parte decree passed after service of process by way of substituted service-Defendant, held, not precluded from afterwards showing order of substituted service having been improperly secured and his being not duly served.-[Substituted service]. Ram Bharose v. Ganga Singh A I R 1931 All. 727 ref. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)- O. V, r. 20, O. IX, r. 13 & O. XLI, r. 21 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts. 164 & 169-Ex parte decree, setting aside of Limitation-Substituted service under O. V, r. 20-Does not amount to "due service"-Due service effected of summons in suit or of notice in appeal-Period of limitation for application to set aside ex parte decree or for rehearing of appeal heard ex parte-To be computed from date of decree-Summons in suit or notice in appeal not "duly served"-Limitation commences from date of knowledge of decree.[Limitation-Ex parte decree]. Dittu Ram v. Nawab A I R 1925 Lah. 634; Hans Raj v. Narain Singh and another A I R 1931 Lah. 118 ; K B. Narasimha Chettiar v. K. P. Balakrishna Chettiar A I R 1927 Mad. 487 ; Vitta Venkatachalam and another v. Si vapurm Subbaya A I R 1928 Mad. 655 ; Shariba Beeby v. Abdul Salam and another A I R 1928 Mad. 815 ; M. R. A. L. Lakshmanan Chetty v. M. R. A. P. L. Palantappa Chetty A I R 1928 Mad. 1052 ; Gynammal v. Abdul Hussain Sahib A I R 1931 Mad.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492